04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUBJBCTIVIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY OP ETHICS 365<br />

Hume's- Refut<strong>at</strong>ion of Egoism* Finally, Hume insists,<br />

we can all desire things other than our own happiness;<br />

we can all, th<strong>at</strong> is to say act from motives other than th<strong>at</strong><br />

of self-love; if we did not, we should not be able to gr<strong>at</strong>ify<br />

self-love. Hie point is one which has already been made in<br />

another connection in criticism of J. S. Mill's Hedonism. 1<br />

Revenge, for example, is sometimes necessary for the<br />

gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion of self-love; but revenge presupposes th<strong>at</strong> we<br />

desire another person's misery. If, however, we can desire<br />

another person's misery, we can desire something other<br />

than our own happiness, and we can and do do this,<br />

even if the invariable effect of the gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion of the<br />

desire, is to promote our own happiness. Hume's refut<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of Egoism does not involve any departure from his position<br />

th<strong>at</strong> nothing has ethical value apart from human consciousness,<br />

and th<strong>at</strong> happiness alone has ethical value. Hume,<br />

admittedly, sometimes writes as if we approved of certain<br />

actions and characters in themselves, but he speedily<br />

corrects himself and makes it clear th<strong>at</strong> all he means is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we have a general approval of happiness combined<br />

with the belief th<strong>at</strong> actions or characters of the type in<br />

question tend to promote it.<br />

Hume's Account of Justice. Hume's grounds for<br />

insisting th<strong>at</strong> it is only happiness, or actions or characters<br />

conducive to happiness, th<strong>at</strong> are valuable are not in<br />

essence different from those which have been urged by<br />

other hedonistic writers. Hume has, however, an interesting<br />

hedonistic argument in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to justice which deserves<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>e mention. In common with others who maintain<br />

th<strong>at</strong> pleasure is the only good, he has to meet the<br />

difficulty th<strong>at</strong> in the course of obeying rules, meting out<br />

justice, and administering laws, we sometimes do wh<strong>at</strong><br />

may be unpleasant for ourselves, wh<strong>at</strong> is certainly<br />

unpleasant to other people, namely, our victims, and<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> seems, therefore, to be detrimental to the general<br />

happiness. Hume agrees th<strong>at</strong> this is indeed so, but it is so,<br />

1 See Chapiter IX, p. 336.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!