04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1TH1GS<br />

function subserves, or why, " if one cares to put it in this<br />

way, "is it 'good* to perform one's function?" Spencer<br />

answers th<strong>at</strong> it is "good" to perform one's function, only in<br />

so far as such performance is a source of pleasure or s<strong>at</strong>is-<br />

faction. For Spencer the only end which a r<strong>at</strong>ional being<br />

can propose to himself is th<strong>at</strong> of a surplus of pleasure over<br />

pain. This end becomes progressively more desirable as<br />

the surplus grows, and if a condition could be reached in<br />

which pain had vanished absolutely, it would become an<br />

absolute end. So far, Spencer's principles diverge very<br />

little from the familiar tenets of Subjectivism and Hedonism.<br />

Good is identified with the right performance of function;<br />

the right performance of function is pleasant, and pleasure<br />

is the end of man. Spencer's distinctive contribution<br />

consists in the answers which he gives to such questions<br />

as " Why pleasure is good, wh<strong>at</strong> sort of conduct is likely<br />

to produce it for us, and why does it do so."<br />

It is by virtue of this contribution th<strong>at</strong> his ethics is<br />

usually entitled scientific. The introduction of science is<br />

effected as follows. It is not enough, says Spencer, th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

ethical philosopher should point out th<strong>at</strong> some things are<br />

pleasant and th<strong>at</strong> these things are good. He must also<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>e why it is th<strong>at</strong> they are good; it is in order<br />

to effect the demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion, th<strong>at</strong> Spencer has recourse to<br />

the theory of evolution.<br />

His Introduction of Evolutionary Concepts into Ethics.<br />

The n<strong>at</strong>ure of any organism is, he holds, determined by<br />

its character as an evolutionary product. As such it will<br />

inevitably tend to preserve and develop itself and to beget<br />

offspring, which will continue the species to which it<br />

belongs. Such evolutionary oper<strong>at</strong>ions are pleasureproducing.<br />

If they were not, we should have no inducement<br />

to perform them; for a man, as Spencer is careful<br />

to point out, would not struggle to maintain an existence<br />

whose pains exceeded its pleasures. Pleasure, then, invests<br />

any vitality-promoting, evolution-furthering form of<br />

behaviour, while pain is a sign of the maladjustment of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!