04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

402<br />

* BTMZGS<br />

ownership of an impulse and its object<br />

It is a fact th<strong>at</strong><br />

It is also a fact<br />

every impulse th<strong>at</strong> I s<strong>at</strong>isfy is my impulse.<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the s<strong>at</strong>isfaction of any impulse brings pleasure. It<br />

does no^ however, follow th<strong>at</strong> my object in s<strong>at</strong>isfying the<br />

impulse is the pleasure which <strong>at</strong>tends its s<strong>at</strong>isfaction.<br />

It is, Butler maintained, possible to distinguish those<br />

actions which proceed from the motive of increasing one's<br />

own pleasure from those which are prompted by the need<br />

to s<strong>at</strong>isfy an impulse. Thus, to take an example, We can<br />

distinguish between a man's purpose in e<strong>at</strong>ing in the case<br />

in which he is seeking to allay hunger, and his purpose<br />

in e<strong>at</strong>ing when he is seeking to obtain pleasant sens<strong>at</strong>ions,<br />

as, for example, when a replete man e<strong>at</strong>s a chocol<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

To assert th<strong>at</strong>, when I feel hunger and e<strong>at</strong>, I do so with<br />

the conscious motive of increasing my. happiness, saying<br />

to myself, 'If I e<strong>at</strong>, I shall get more pleasure than if I<br />

refrain from e<strong>at</strong>ing; therefore I will e<strong>at</strong>' is psychologically<br />

incorrect. When I raise my fork to my lips, I am not<br />

conscious of any such motive: I am conscious only of a<br />

feeling of hunger, combined, if I think about the m<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

<strong>at</strong> all, which I usually do not, with the belief th<strong>at</strong> food<br />

will s<strong>at</strong>isfy my hunger. The hedonist makes the mistake<br />

of concluding th<strong>at</strong>, because by e<strong>at</strong>ing food .and allaying<br />

need I obtain pleasure, it was <strong>at</strong> the pleasure th<strong>at</strong> I was<br />

consciously aiming when I raised my fork to my lips. But<br />

this is to put the cart before the horse. It is to suppose<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, because pleasure (P)<br />

occurs when I obtain some-<br />

thing (X) th<strong>at</strong> I want, therefore, I only wanted (X)<br />

because of (P); but, if I had not wanted (X) for its own<br />

sake, I should not have experienced (P) on obtaining it.<br />

(P), in other words, only occurred because I wanted (X)<br />

independently of (P). Hence, th<strong>at</strong> we should desire things<br />

other than pleasure is sometimes a necessary condition<br />

of our experiencing pleasure.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> BY-PRODUCT <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF PLEASURE, So<br />

far is it from being true th<strong>at</strong> I am always motiv<strong>at</strong>ed soltly<br />

by the desire to obtain pleasure for myself, th<strong>at</strong> a plausible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!