04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> SPLIT 199<br />

looking to a single spiritual head. Th<strong>at</strong> man was a spiritual<br />

being was generally agreed, and the belief in his future<br />

life was universally accepted. For this future life, earthly<br />

existence was a prepar<strong>at</strong>ion, and it was with reference<br />

to it th<strong>at</strong> earthly duties were defined. Wh<strong>at</strong> was the place<br />

of politics in such a scheme? The injunction to render<br />

unto Caesar the things th<strong>at</strong> were Caesar's had the highest<br />

authority, and should no doubt be followed. But wh<strong>at</strong>,<br />

in feet, did it entail? The question was one by which<br />

St. Thomas was considerably exercised. If men's souls<br />

are immortal, in wh<strong>at</strong> sense can they belong to the St<strong>at</strong>e?<br />

If men's duty, and allegiance are owed to a heavenly ruler,<br />

to do His will and keep His commandments, how can<br />

they be under the command of an earthly one? Wh<strong>at</strong>,<br />

in short, should be the limits. of a necessary temporal<br />

power over essentially spiritual beings?<br />

St. Thomas's conclusions may be st<strong>at</strong>ed briefly as<br />

follows. First, man has two n<strong>at</strong>ures, a n<strong>at</strong>ural 1 and a<br />

supern<strong>at</strong>ural, and he can live upon the plane of either.<br />

Secondly, the salv<strong>at</strong>ion of the individual soul lies not in<br />

this life, but in the hereafter. The salv<strong>at</strong>ion of man's<br />

soul will, therefore, be achieved not by his n<strong>at</strong>ural but<br />

of the<br />

by his supern<strong>at</strong>ural n<strong>at</strong>ure. Thirdly, the object<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e is the promotion of the good of the individuals<br />

who compose it, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, in die last resort the prepar<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of their souls for salv<strong>at</strong>ion. So far, no particular<br />

difficulty has presented itself, but <strong>at</strong> this point a problem<br />

arises. The St<strong>at</strong>e must, St. Thomas agrees, possess authority,<br />

if only to enable it to perform its function of promoting<br />

the good of its citizens. Yet God is the ultim<strong>at</strong>e authority<br />

in all things, and his power extends no less over man's<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural, than over his supern<strong>at</strong>ural, self. Over man's<br />

supern<strong>at</strong>ural self God's authority is unchallenged and<br />

supreme, but over man's n<strong>at</strong>ural self, so far as it junctions<br />

1 Thc word "n<strong>at</strong>ural" is not here used in its Greek meaning to<br />

denote the fullest development of a man's potentialities. St. Thomas<br />

uses it in ft sense *wiucti approxim<strong>at</strong>es move closeiy to its modern<br />

meaning, to denote man primitive, and, on St. Thomas s pfenusei,<br />

unrry.ncff<strong>at</strong>e, sen*<br />

En

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!