04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARIS<strong>TO</strong>TLE'S MORALS AND POLITICS in<br />

psychologists tend to think of reason as a kind of engine,<br />

and of desire as the steam th<strong>at</strong> causes it to function. It is<br />

only when a sufficient head of steam has accumul<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

the boiler th<strong>at</strong> the engine moves. The analogy illustr<strong>at</strong>es<br />

the conception with which Aristotle has been traditionally<br />

credited of the rel<strong>at</strong>ion between reason and desire; th<strong>at</strong><br />

is to say, between the intellectual and the appetitive<br />

elements in the will and their bearing upon conduct.<br />

This conception represents reason as being merely the<br />

servant of desire; but if reason is the servant of desire,<br />

reason is not free. Wh<strong>at</strong>, then, is the st<strong>at</strong>us of desire?<br />

Desire and emotion, it will be remembered, are, in Aristotle's<br />

scheme, neither good nor bad. They only become<br />

the objects of ethical judgment when they oper<strong>at</strong>e in a<br />

certain way; when, in other words, they become directed<br />

to certain ends. Now the ends to which the desires of the<br />

ordinary man are directed are those to which the educ<strong>at</strong>or<br />

by his system of educ<strong>at</strong>ion, the legisl<strong>at</strong>or by the provisions<br />

of his laws, have directed them. In other words, wh<strong>at</strong> we,<br />

as ordinary men and women, desire is not determined by<br />

us, but for us.<br />

The Doctrine of Self-Determinism. 2. Let us now<br />

consider Aristotle's doctrine of the will in its bearing upon<br />

his general theory of character form<strong>at</strong>ion. Character, it<br />

will be remembered, is defined as "a settled condition of<br />

the soul which wills or chooses" to act in certain ways.<br />

Character, in other words, expresses itself in actions, and<br />

the will is th<strong>at</strong> aspect of character which chooses the<br />

actions. By wh<strong>at</strong>, then, is the will determined? Presumably<br />

by the character, for according to our character's com*<br />

plotion, so do we will. Wh<strong>at</strong>, then, it is important to know,<br />

forms the character? The answer would appear to be<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the character is formed by acts of will. The suggestion<br />

of circularity in this argument is important, and it is worth<br />

while pausing to develop it<br />

Let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> I am a person continually given to<br />

good works; all my actions, we will suppose, are notjlc,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!