04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER V: <strong>THE</strong> SCOPE OF<br />

ETHICS<br />

Subject M<strong>at</strong>ter of Ethics. Ethics is a branch of study<br />

which is difficult to define, for, if we put the question,<br />

" Wh<strong>at</strong> are the subjects with which ethics deals, wh<strong>at</strong>,<br />

in fact, is ethics about?" the answer is largely determined<br />

by the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the ethical views which we adopt. This<br />

is true not only of the boundaries of the subject, but also<br />

of its core, a writer's view of both being dependent upon<br />

and largely determined by the adoption of a particular<br />

ethical position.<br />

Some of the questions which have been considered by<br />

different writers to be the central questions of ethics are:<br />

(i) Wh<strong>at</strong> thing is ultim<strong>at</strong>ely good, or, if there is more<br />

than one thing which is ultim<strong>at</strong>ely good, wh<strong>at</strong> things<br />

are ultim<strong>at</strong>ely good?<br />

(a) Wh<strong>at</strong> is the basis of moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion? If we take<br />

the view th<strong>at</strong> the word "ought" does mean something,<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, in other words, there may be a distinction, and a<br />

valid one, between wh<strong>at</strong> we ought to do and wh<strong>at</strong> we<br />

would like to do, it may be asked, "Why 'ought 9<br />

we to<br />

do wh<strong>at</strong> we ought to do?" The correct answer to this<br />

question, if it could be given, would tell us wh<strong>at</strong> moral<br />

oblig<strong>at</strong>ion is.<br />

(3) By means of wh<strong>at</strong> faculty do we recognize our moral<br />

oblig<strong>at</strong>ion? Is it reason or feeling, or a mixture of the two,<br />

or a unique faculty sometimes known as the moral sense,<br />

sometimes as conscience, which tells us our duty as immedi<strong>at</strong>ely,<br />

if not as unerringly, as our sense of taste tells<br />

us wh<strong>at</strong> tastes sweet and wh<strong>at</strong> sour, and our sense of<br />

smell which odours are pleasant, which repulsive?<br />

(4) Wh<strong>at</strong> do we mean by a right action? Is it, for<br />

example, the same as the action which we think we ought

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!