04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER IV: <strong>THE</strong> MORAL AND<br />

POLITICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF<br />

ARIS<strong>TO</strong>TLE 1<br />

Introductory. It is not easy<br />

to summarize Aristotle's<br />

contribution to moral and political theory. Not only are<br />

some of his conclusions inconsistent, <strong>at</strong> times even contra-<br />

dictory, but the salient fe<strong>at</strong>ures of his proposals are closely<br />

modelled on those of Pl<strong>at</strong>o, and it is difficult to do them<br />

justice without running the risk of repetition.<br />

Aristotle has a habit of starting, and starting avowedly,<br />

from positions which are the antitheses of those of Pl<strong>at</strong>o,<br />

yet ending in conclusions which are scarcely, if <strong>at</strong> all,<br />

distinguishable from those ofUs predecessor. The st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

just made would seem to impute a charge of inconsistency.<br />

The charge must on occasion be admitted. For example,<br />

the Jficomachaean Ethics, usually known simply as the<br />

Ethics, which, many would hold, is Aristotle's most important<br />

work on philosophy, seems <strong>at</strong> first sight to contain two<br />

fundamentally different accounts of the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the good<br />

life for the individual. The charge, however, in so fkr as<br />

it can be substanti<strong>at</strong>ed, is a purely<br />

formal one. Aristotle<br />

never revised the Ethics, and loose ends have been left<br />

which revision would almost certainly have tidied. It is<br />

difficult to believe th<strong>at</strong> the founder of logic, had he had<br />

time or occasion to revise his own work, would have failed<br />

to notice the inconsistencies upon which readers have<br />

been so quick to seize.<br />

As to the apparent lack of originality, it is never more<br />

$han apparent. Although Aristotle's main conclusions,<br />

both in regard to ethics and politics, differ little from those<br />

of Pl<strong>at</strong>o, he gives them a different emphasis, uses different<br />

1 384-322 **

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!