04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIETY. ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN 475<br />

tion under which alone security can be guaranteed. We<br />

cannot, therefore, desire to revolt against the sovereign, or<br />

even to weaken his power. There is, then, no right, there<br />

is even, Hobbes seems to say, no possibility of disobedience.<br />

For, once again, men appoint a ruler th<strong>at</strong> they may have<br />

security; in order th<strong>at</strong> he may give them security, his<br />

authority must be unquestioned, and to question it is to<br />

neg<strong>at</strong>e the object with which society was constituted and<br />

a ruler appointed.<br />

To put the point in another way, the sovereign's right<br />

to rule derives from his ability to fulfil the conditions and to<br />

realize the purposes which led men to vest their powers<br />

in him. His right, in fact, resides in his might, and his might<br />

is the measure of his right. Thus the sovereign possesses<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> Hobbes, if he were to make use of ethical conceptions,<br />

might call a moral right to rule his subjects in so far as,<br />

and only in so far as, he has power to rule them.<br />

So long as his ability to give security persists, the sovereign<br />

is supreme; his subjects cannot modify his powers, or depose<br />

him and substitute another sovereign for th<strong>at</strong> would be<br />

a breach cf the covenant upon which they have entered<br />

nor can they dissent from his decisions, nor refuse to obey<br />

his edicts for th<strong>at</strong> would be to put themselves outside the<br />

community and the reign of law which the community<br />

establishes, and back into the st<strong>at</strong>e of n<strong>at</strong>ure, in which<br />

anybody would have the right to destroy them. On the<br />

other hand, the ruler cannot himself forfeit or abuse his<br />

powers, since he himself is outside the covenant which<br />

brought him into being and there is, therefore, no covenant<br />

for him to break.<br />

Since the community exists in and through the power<br />

which has been vested in the sovereign, the sovereign is<br />

both its represent<strong>at</strong>ive and its agent. All the acts which the<br />

community does, or which any member of the community<br />

does, are his acts, and vice versa. "A commonwealth," writes<br />

Hobbes, "is said to be instituted when a multitude of men<br />

do agree, and covenant, every one with every one, th<strong>at</strong> to wh<strong>at</strong>-<br />

soever man, or assembly of men, shall be given by the major

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!