04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRITICISM OF IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY 737<br />

" unreal " will of which I am ordinarily aware, the alleged<br />

"real" will being defined as a will to carry out every<br />

decision of the majority of the associ<strong>at</strong>ion to which I belong,<br />

when the will of which I am actually conscious expresses<br />

itself in a conviction th<strong>at</strong> the decisions in question are *<br />

wrong. It is, indeed, difficult to escape the conclusion th<strong>at</strong><br />

the <strong>at</strong>tribution of a "real" will to the individual which is<br />

necessarily and always in accord with the General Will in<br />

which it is presumed to be merged, is little more a device<br />

for giving an appearance of legitimacy to wh<strong>at</strong> must<br />

otherwise appear the purely arbitrary and tyrannical acts<br />

of a sovereign St<strong>at</strong>e. By means of this device, supporters of<br />

the idealist theory of the St<strong>at</strong>e are enabled to conclude th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

whenever a conflict occurs between an individual and the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, the l<strong>at</strong>ter must inevitably be right.<br />

RELEVANCE OF <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF GROUPS. At<br />

this point some account must be given of the political<br />

theory of groups. For it is not only the claims of the individual<br />

which must be considered in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the St<strong>at</strong>e,<br />

but the claims of individuals organized in groups other<br />

than the St<strong>at</strong>e, whose members are also members of the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e. For the question inevitably presents itself, if the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, which is an organiz<strong>at</strong>ion of individuals for certain<br />

purposes, has a being and a will of its own in which the<br />

beings and wills of individual members are merged, and<br />

by which they are transcended, why<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ions of individuals also beings<br />

own, and why are they<br />

have not other<br />

and wills of their<br />

also not entitled to claim th<strong>at</strong><br />

their corpor<strong>at</strong>e being and their General Will transcends the<br />

beings and wills of their individual members? The consider<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

ofthese questions introduces the theory of groups.<br />

(II) Th<strong>at</strong> if the St<strong>at</strong>e owns a Personality, other Associ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

also own Personalities<br />

In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries a number<br />

of writers did in fact put forward the view th<strong>at</strong> all groups<br />

possessed "real personalities". Among these was F. W.<br />

AAM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!