04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY SURVEYED 4! I<br />

and do not happen to be wanting chocol<strong>at</strong>es, my cognition<br />

of the chocol<strong>at</strong>es will probably be characterized by a<br />

neutral hedonic tone; if I am badly in need of chocol<strong>at</strong>es<br />

but am unable to pay for them, it is probable t&<strong>at</strong> the<br />

hedonic tone which characterizes my cognition will be<br />

disagreeable. If9 however, I buy them and taste them and<br />

enjoy them, I shall be cognizing the chocol<strong>at</strong>es pleasurably.<br />

Now it seems improbable th<strong>at</strong> we lever have an<br />

experience which has no qualities except its hedonic ones:<br />

it seems unlikely, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, th<strong>at</strong> we ever have an<br />

experience which is one of pure pleasure or of pure pain;<br />

for all our experiences, if I am right, are experiences of<br />

something, and it is th<strong>at</strong> of which they are experiences<br />

which gives them their distinctive non-hedonic qualities.<br />

Thus when I say th<strong>at</strong> an experience of excessive drinking,<br />

or of drug-taking, is pleasant but shameful, wh<strong>at</strong> I mean, if<br />

this analysis is right, is th<strong>at</strong> I like it for its hedonic<br />

qualities, although I dislike it for its non-hedonic qualities;<br />

if I say th<strong>at</strong> so-and-so is virtuous but disagreeable, I<br />

mean th<strong>at</strong> the non-hedonic qualities which characterize<br />

my cognition of so-and-so are respectful,<br />

but th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

hedonic qualities are unpleasant. This is probably wh<strong>at</strong><br />

Mill meant by his ambiguous distinction between higher<br />

and lower pleasures. 1 If the foregoing is right, all<br />

hedonic qualities are qualit<strong>at</strong>ively the same; they differ<br />

only in degree. The difference between die so-called<br />

higher and lower pleasures is, therefore, a difference^<br />

between the non-hedonic qualities th<strong>at</strong> characterize two<br />

st<strong>at</strong>es of mind which may be the same in respect of<br />

their hedonic qualities. To revert to the case <<br />

l<strong>at</strong>es, we should not say, on this view, th<strong>at</strong><br />

a chocol<strong>at</strong>e, I am desiring pleasure,<br />

is the characteristic experience of <<br />

happens to have a pleasant hedonic<br />

aim purely <strong>at</strong> pleasure; wh<strong>at</strong> we<br />

which the hedonist would say th<strong>at</strong><br />

own pleasure, is the enjoyment of a<br />

* See Chapter IX, p, 330.^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!