04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NATURE OF <strong>THE</strong> MORAL FACULTY 285<br />

normally regarded as being appropri<strong>at</strong>e to reason, his<br />

predecessor, Cudworth (1617-1688) had pronounced<br />

quite unequivocally in favour of reason. With considerable<br />

emphasis he insists th<strong>at</strong> our consciousness of the<br />

difference between right and wrong depends wholly upon<br />

the exercise of our reasoning faculties, and in no degree<br />

wh<strong>at</strong>ever upon feeling or emotion. It is quite possible<br />

th<strong>at</strong> this is true, but unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely for Cudworth 's Intuitionism,<br />

our reasoning faculties refuse to make moral<br />

judgments without considering circumstances and conse-<br />

quences. I shall return l<strong>at</strong>er to this point and develop its<br />

significance.<br />

Happiness<br />

the Reward of Virtue. There is another<br />

p<strong>at</strong>h which leads from Shaftesbury's Intuitionism to<br />

Utilitarianism. Shaftesbury's main position is quite un-<br />

equivocally th<strong>at</strong> of an objective intuitionist; he holds, th<strong>at</strong><br />

is to say, th<strong>at</strong> the universe contains elements or factors which<br />

we recognize to be good or right, but whose goodness or<br />

lightness is in no sense dependent upon our recognition<br />

of them. Misconduct is not wrong because we disapprove<br />

of it; we disapprove of it because it is wrong. When<br />

our feelings tell us th<strong>at</strong> vice is odious they are, Shaftesbury<br />

holds, giving us true inform<strong>at</strong>ion about the n<strong>at</strong>ure of<br />

things. Similarly, virtue, which may bt defined on Shaftesbury's<br />

view as the habit of acting in accordance with the<br />

moral law, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, with the Will of N<strong>at</strong>ure, is good<br />

whether its goodness is recognized or not. But, while<br />

insisting th<strong>at</strong> virtue is good in itself, Shaftesbury concedes<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is also conducive to happiness and, because con-<br />

as a means to an end<br />

ducive to happiness, therefore good<br />

beyond itself as well as good in itself.<br />

On this point his view was reinforced by th<strong>at</strong> of his con-<br />

temporary, Cumberland (1632-1718), who, more forcibly<br />

than Shaftesbury, emphasized the happiness-producing<br />

property of virtue. Public happiness, said Cumberland<br />

the utilitarians were l<strong>at</strong>er to call it the gre<strong>at</strong>est happiness<br />

of the gre<strong>at</strong>est number is a good. Hence any act which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!