04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 179<br />

our notions of colour. We form the general idea of red,<br />

he maintained, from seeing particular instance! of red<br />

objects, and then abstracting from them their common<br />

quality. Similarly, we form Our general notion of right<br />

and wrong from perceiving particular situ<strong>at</strong>ions which<br />

exhibit ethical qualities, whether good or bad, and then<br />

abstracting the ethical qualities from the particular cases<br />

which happen to have exhibited them. And just as, in<br />

the case of red, a particular faculty, namely, the faculty<br />

of vision, sees wh<strong>at</strong> is red, so th<strong>at</strong>, lacking the faculty,<br />

we should be without the notion of red, so, in the case<br />

of morals, a particular faculty, the faculty known as the<br />

moral sense, discerns the moral qualities which the world<br />

of men and things exhibits, so th<strong>at</strong>, lacking th<strong>at</strong> faculty,<br />

we should be without moral conceptions. The faculty is<br />

defined as "the moral sense of beauty in actions and<br />

affections, by which we perceive virtue or vice in our*<br />

selves or others". It is implied th<strong>at</strong> actions and situ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

are right or wrong in themselves, th<strong>at</strong> persons and char-<br />

acters are virtuous and vicious, and th<strong>at</strong> the moral sense<br />

tells us in regard to each particular one of them whether<br />

it is right or wrong.<br />

Thomas Clarke (1675-1729) took the same line, regard*<br />

ing our judgments of right and wrong and the moral<br />

oblig<strong>at</strong>ion which they lay upon us to do the right and<br />

refrain from the wrong, as arising from and being rel<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

to essential differences in the n<strong>at</strong>ure of things. In developing<br />

this notion of essential differences Clarke made use of<br />

an analogy based on physics and m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ics. There is<br />

in the physical world wh<strong>at</strong> he called a "mutual consist-<br />

ency" among things, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, they "consist" together<br />

in such a way as to exhibit the workings of law. If everything<br />

in the universe behaved purely individually and<br />

showed no likeness to the behaviour of anything else, the<br />

formul<strong>at</strong>ion of physical laws would, it is obvious, be impossible.<br />

But such purely individual behaviour is not found.<br />

Not only docs ice which has been subjected to a certain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!