04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY SURVEYED 403<br />

caie can be made out for the view th<strong>at</strong> it is only when I<br />

aim <strong>at</strong> something other than my pleasure, th<strong>at</strong> I succeed<br />

in obtaining pleasure. Many moralists have pointed out<br />

th<strong>at</strong> to pursue pleasure directly is to miss it. The kingdom<br />

of pleasure, they say, cannot be taken by storm any more<br />

than the kingdom of beauty can be taken by storm.<br />

Pleasure, which evades direct pursuit, sometimes consents<br />

to grace our st<strong>at</strong>es of mind when we are actively engaged<br />

inp the pursuit and achievement of something other than<br />

pleasure. It tends, in particular, to be experienced when<br />

faculties which are fully developed are being called into<br />

the fullest activity of which they are capable. This is the<br />

gist of Aristotle's famous account of pleasure, in the tenth<br />

book of the Nicomachaean Ethics, as a by-product or something<br />

added.<br />

If one of our senses is in a healthy st<strong>at</strong>e and is engaged<br />

in reporting to us the n<strong>at</strong>ure of an object of an appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

kind, for example in the case of sight, an object which is<br />

easily visible, then, says Aristotle, the activity of th<strong>at</strong> sense<br />

is necessarily pleasant. The same is true of the activity<br />

of thought when it is engaged upon a suitable object.<br />

In asserting th<strong>at</strong> activities of this kind are pleasant, Aristotle<br />

emphasizes the fact th<strong>at</strong> the pleasure completes the<br />

activity. Pleasure, in other words, perfects the activity<br />

which it accompanies, although it is not a part of the<br />

activity, nor is it its necessary condition. Aristotle takes a<br />

parallel from the case of health. When a healthy young<br />

man is engaged in an activity calling forth his fullest<br />

powers, there is a superadded completion or perfection<br />

upon his health which gives it a bloom. Now pleasure is<br />

of this character; like the bloom upon the cheek of a young<br />

man it is not aimed <strong>at</strong>, but is a something added, a sign<br />

th<strong>at</strong> a healthy organism is functioning as it ought to do<br />

in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to a suitable object.<br />

The account of pleasure given by Aristotle is a st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

of psychological fact r<strong>at</strong>her than an exposition of philosophical<br />

theory; and, on the point of psychological fact, there<br />

is little doubt th<strong>at</strong> Aristotle is right. The by-product

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!