04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

778<br />

ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> MODERNS<br />

and morals are tre<strong>at</strong>ed as the by-products of economics.<br />

Democr<strong>at</strong>ic and liberal thinking differs from both Communism<br />

and Fascism in holding th<strong>at</strong> a man's ethical<br />

and political views are his own concern, and th<strong>at</strong> he should<br />

be free to hold them and to practice the conduct which they<br />

enjoin without interference by the St<strong>at</strong>e. The question<br />

therefore arises, whether, granting the presuppositions of<br />

democr<strong>at</strong>ic theory, the St<strong>at</strong>e has any part to play in the<br />

spheres of ethics and religion and, if so, wh<strong>at</strong> part. Once<br />

again it will, I think, be found th<strong>at</strong> the function of the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in this regard is wh<strong>at</strong>, in its rel<strong>at</strong>ion to economic associa-<br />

tions, I have called a background function. The need for<br />

a political organiz<strong>at</strong>ion to discharge this function arises<br />

from two sets of consider<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

(i) I have stressed on an earlier page the importance of<br />

spontaneity in ethical and religious m<strong>at</strong>ters. 1 A man<br />

should, democr<strong>at</strong>s and individualists have urged, be free<br />

to choose for himself both creed and code. I have also<br />

drawn <strong>at</strong>tention to the frequency with which original<br />

insight in the sphere of ethics and religion brings the<br />

prophet, seer, preacher or original moralist into conflict<br />

with die St<strong>at</strong>e. 1 "<br />

The question accordingly arises, In wh<strong>at</strong><br />

circumstances, if any, the St<strong>at</strong>e has a right to suppress<br />

ethical or religions beliefs"? The friends of liberty would<br />

maintain th<strong>at</strong> there are none. The question <strong>at</strong> issue here<br />

is one of ultim<strong>at</strong>e values,* and I do not see how it is possible<br />

to settle it by argument. Where, however, the effects upon<br />

others of the dissemin<strong>at</strong>ion of original ethical and religious<br />

beliefs are concerned, a different set of consider<strong>at</strong>ions arises.<br />

It is a commonplace th<strong>at</strong> the effects of an individual's<br />

teaching and example extend into spheres outside his<br />

personal cognizance, affect the conduct of men whom he<br />

may never know, and often result in lines of conduct of<br />

which he would be the first to disapprove* The feet th<strong>at</strong><br />

he may be ignorant of the effects of his teaching upon<br />

See Chapter VIII, bp. 308*310.<br />

* See p. 788 below lor a development of this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!