04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ETHICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY SURVEYED 393<br />

or persons approve of", wh<strong>at</strong> a man calls right will very<br />

largely depend upon wh<strong>at</strong> he docs happen to approve of,<br />

and to approve of in the vast majority of cases for non-<br />

ethical reasons. We cannot, then, simply trust to people's<br />

intuitions of right and wrong to determine wh<strong>at</strong> is right and<br />

wrong, if only because, to do so, would be to admit th<strong>at</strong><br />

the *ame action can be both right and wrong <strong>at</strong> the same<br />

time. Secondly, if the faculty by means of which moral<br />

judgments are passed and the performance of is duty<br />

motiv<strong>at</strong>ed is<br />

feeling or is akin to feeling, it is difficult to<br />

escape from the conclusion th<strong>at</strong> its deliverances are determined.<br />

Moral freedom, is, therefore, an illusion and ethics<br />

falls to the ground.<br />

Thirdly, if the deliverances of the faculty by means of<br />

which moral judgments are passed are to be exoner<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

from the charge of being purely arbitrary, the faculty<br />

must be credited with some admixture of reason. If it<br />

is to be reasonable in deliverance, it must be reasonable in<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure. Now reason refuses to admit th<strong>at</strong> we can isol<strong>at</strong>e<br />

actions as the objects of ethical judgment. Reason judges<br />

about a whole situ<strong>at</strong>ion including motives, actions and consequences;<br />

It insists, in particular, th<strong>at</strong> consequences must<br />

be taken into account, if only because the political and<br />

legal systems of mankind would be rendered nug<strong>at</strong>ory if<br />

we were to concede th<strong>at</strong> motive was sufficient to establish<br />

ethical worth. As Dr. Johnson said when criticizing the<br />

views ofRousseau, who held th<strong>at</strong> motive alone was the concern<br />

of moral judgment: "Sir, th<strong>at</strong> will not do. We cannot<br />

prove any man's intention to be bad. You may shoot a man<br />

through the head, and say you intended to miss him;<br />

but the judge will order you to be hanged. An alleged<br />

want of intention, when evil is committed, will not be<br />

allowed in a court of justice. Rousseau, Sir, is a very bad<br />

man. I would sooner sign a sentence for his transport<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

than th<strong>at</strong> of any felon who has gone from the Old Bailey<br />

these many years." In other words, actual consequences<br />

must be considered.<br />

This is not to say th<strong>at</strong> intended consequences, do net<br />

Ni

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!