04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong>ORY OF COMMUNISM Jll<br />

as the examples of development. The opposite view, which<br />

appears in die works of Marx and Engcls, is nothing but<br />

nineteenth-century optimism/ 1<br />

The issue, as Russell goes on to point out, has practical<br />

importance to-day. The fundamental conflict in modern<br />

civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, according to the Marxist analysis, is th<strong>at</strong><br />

between Communism and Capitalism. In the Communist<br />

Manifesto, published in 1848, Marx envisages the possibility<br />

th<strong>at</strong> chaos may result from this conflict, but his usual<br />

view, the view which pervades his l<strong>at</strong>er writings, is th<strong>at</strong><br />

the conflict, after some partial victories for Capitalism,<br />

will end in the triumph of the proletari<strong>at</strong>. This result is<br />

in strict accordance with the dialectical theory, which<br />

teaches th<strong>at</strong> the establishment of one of two opposed<br />

tendencies, Capitalism, will lead to the triumph of its contrary,<br />

Communism, which will also embody all th<strong>at</strong> is good<br />

in Capitalism. In actual feet, however, the opposition may<br />

quite possibly lead to a series of wars in which, under<br />

modern conditions, there is a substantial chance th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

whole of civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, as we know it, will be destroyed.<br />

Hence not Communism, but barbarism, may well be the<br />

next stage in the development of human history.<br />

How Far Dialectical Development Entails Progress.<br />

Whether Marx himself envisaged this possibility is not<br />

clear. Had he been taxed with consider<strong>at</strong>ions of the kind<br />

just mentioned, he would probably have insisted th<strong>at</strong> it<br />

had never been his intention to postul<strong>at</strong>e the oper<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

a necessary law of progress. 'A return to barbarism as<br />

the result of another world war is/ he might maintain,<br />

'perfectly consistent with the tenets of the Dialectic, as I<br />

understand it, in its applic<strong>at</strong>ion to history* For a return to<br />

barbarism cannot in any sense be called a development,<br />

and it is only to development th<strong>at</strong> the Dialectic applies.<br />

Now so far as development is concerned, all th<strong>at</strong> I<br />

ever wished to maintain is th<strong>at</strong>, if there is to be development<br />

in the historical process, then the next stage in th<strong>at</strong><br />

development must inevitably be Communism/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!