04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

270<br />

*<br />

ETHICS<br />

common with others, be represented by the dctenninist<br />

not as the expressions of a freely acting will, but as the<br />

determined resultants of the interaction of a number of<br />

factors over which the will has no control; it can even<br />

be shown th<strong>at</strong> the will is itself one of these factors. But<br />

primn facie it is much harder to apply the explan<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

choice of action in terms of origins to a man's decision to<br />

move his knight r<strong>at</strong>her than his bishop than it is to his<br />

preference for a blonde over a brunette; much harder to<br />

show th<strong>at</strong> his decision to take the left fork is determined<br />

by his physiological constitution, than it is to ascribe to<br />

physiological factors his preference for treacle toffee over<br />

marzipan. If, then, the fact offreedom is to be demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

in any sphere, the demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion will be easiest in rel<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

to those choices which would be normally said to be pre-<br />

dominantly r<strong>at</strong>ional.<br />

Free Will in Rel<strong>at</strong>ion to Moral Choice. Most<br />

writers on ethics have held th<strong>at</strong> moral choices are of this<br />

character. The position, then, which I have been outlining,<br />

namely, th<strong>at</strong> the will is on occasion determined by nothing<br />

but an impartial judgment of the lightness or reasonableness<br />

of a particular line of action, is one which most moral<br />

philosophers have been disposed to adopt. On wh<strong>at</strong> grounds<br />

have they supported it? Or, to put again the question<br />

formul<strong>at</strong>ed above, how have they sought to show th<strong>at</strong><br />

wh<strong>at</strong> is called thought can motiv<strong>at</strong>e our actions? No very<br />

convincing argument has ever been brought forward in<br />

favour of this position. The issue, as I have already pointed<br />

out, is one in regard to which proof is not possible. Wh<strong>at</strong><br />

the philosophers have done is wh<strong>at</strong>, on a previous page,<br />

I suggested th<strong>at</strong> the reader should do, they have looked<br />

into their own consciousnesses and reported th<strong>at</strong>, as Henry<br />

"<br />

Sidgwick (1838-1900) puts it, the perception or judgment<br />

th<strong>at</strong> an act IB per st the right and reasonable act to be done<br />

is an adequ<strong>at</strong>e motive to perform it".<br />

Having looked into my own consciousness, I feel th<strong>at</strong> I<br />

can subscribe to Sidgwick's affirm<strong>at</strong>ion; I believe, th<strong>at</strong> is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!