04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

424<br />

ETHICS<br />

we do do it, or of approving of the disposition to do it<br />

in others, any more than we can help having a good eye<br />

<strong>at</strong> games or disliking marzipan. Now ethics, as has been<br />

pointed out on a number of occasions, entails freedom,<br />

and moral virtue must be freely achieved, or else it is not<br />

moral virtue. In so far, then, as the subjectivisms account<br />

of moral virtue in terms of its origins and predisposing<br />

conditions is valid,<br />

by moral virtue th<strong>at</strong> is being so accounted for.<br />

it turns out th<strong>at</strong> it is not wh<strong>at</strong> we mean<br />

THAT MORAL VIRTUE is NOT DESCRIBABLE IN<br />

TERMS OF ITS EFFECTS. While subjectivist theories<br />

specify the conditioning circumstances from which moral<br />

virtue takes its rise, Utilitarianism looks to its results; when,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> is to say, it seeks to give an account ofwh<strong>at</strong> we mean by<br />

moral virtue, Utilitarianism adopts the third of the methods<br />

enumer<strong>at</strong>ed above. A right action, says the utilitarian, is<br />

one which has the best consequences, and a virtuous<br />

man is he who habitually performs actions which<br />

have good consequences. Moral virtue, then, has wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

termed an instrumental value; it is valuable because it<br />

is instrumental in producing certain effects. If moral virtue<br />

is described as something which has a certain kind of<br />

effect, and is regarded as desirable because it has th<strong>at</strong><br />

effect, then it is being valued not for its own sake, but for<br />

the sake of something else, namely, for the sake of its<br />

effects. But just as, when we sought to give an account<br />

of moral virtue by specifying the conditions and circumstances<br />

in which it arose, it turned out th<strong>at</strong> it was not<br />

moral virtue th<strong>at</strong> we had described, since moral virtue<br />

entails freedom, and th<strong>at</strong> which is a function of a set of<br />

conditions could not have been other than wh<strong>at</strong> it is, so<br />

it turns out th<strong>at</strong>, when we try to give an account of mora 1<br />

virtue in terms of its effects, it is, once again, not mora.<br />

of some-<br />

virtue th<strong>at</strong> we are describing, itince, when we say<br />

thing th<strong>at</strong> it produces something else and then proceed<br />

to <strong>at</strong>tribute value to it for the sake of the something<br />

else which it produces, the something in question which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!