04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL RIGHTS 565<br />

To wh<strong>at</strong>, we ask, arc there rights? To "liberty, property,<br />

security and resistance of oppression", Paine answers. But<br />

how, one may ask, does he know? The question must be<br />

put, for prime fade the assertion th<strong>at</strong> Paine's rights do in<br />

fact exist may easily be challenged. Take, for example,<br />

the right to property. A socialist would say th<strong>at</strong> no man<br />

has a right to property unless he does socially useful work;<br />

as Bernard Shaw has frequently announced, a man has<br />

no right to consume without producing. Again, property<br />

may be used in a manner injurious to the community, as<br />

when a man Employs his capital to make a corner in some<br />

socially valuable commodity; buys stretches of unspoiled<br />

coastline, to which the public has hitherto had access, in<br />

order to preserve them for his own exclusive enjoyment,<br />

or to cover them with bungalows for his own profit; floods<br />

the market with harmful drugs, or gains control of a<br />

newspaper in order to debauch the public taste. A man's<br />

right to property,, is, most people would, accordingly,<br />

agree, subject to consider<strong>at</strong>ions of public utility. Again,<br />

who are to be regarded as the n<strong>at</strong>ural possessors of rights?<br />

Babies and lun<strong>at</strong>ics? Possibly, but also possibly not! Even<br />

the rights of a minor may be questioned. His right to<br />

property, for example, is not admitted by the law, which<br />

requires th<strong>at</strong> it shall be held in trust until he ceases to be<br />

a minor. Consider, again, Locke's st<strong>at</strong>ement th<strong>at</strong>, as all men<br />

are " equal and independent, no one ought to harm another<br />

in his life, health, liberty or possessions ". The obvious comment<br />

seems to be th<strong>at</strong> whether one is or is not entitled to<br />

harm another in these respects depends entirely upon circum-<br />

stances. To adapt the question which Socr<strong>at</strong>es puts to<br />

Cephalus <strong>at</strong> the beginning of Pl<strong>at</strong>o's Republic, has a lun<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

the right to possessions which happen to include a revolver?<br />

And y if one has borrowed the revolver, has one not a<br />

right to harm him in respect of this " possession," by failing<br />

to return it? Let us imagine the case of a beleaguered city<br />

in which food is nujtniog short and there is fear th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

garrison may be starved before a relieving force makes<br />

its appearance. Has a baby, a child, a woman or an old

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!