04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONI1M<br />

as they appear, and is tx typothesi therefore, something<br />

other than moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion and the moral law which<br />

oblig<strong>at</strong>ion recognizes.<br />

Nevertheless, the sense of moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion is a feet, a<br />

fact which, Kant has tried to show, derives its authority<br />

from the real world, the corollary being th<strong>at</strong>, in virtue<br />

of our ability to recognize its promptings and obey its<br />

commands, we, in respect of our moral selves, own mem*<br />

bership<br />

of th<strong>at</strong> world.<br />

Such, in outline, is Kant's theory of morals* Its strength<br />

lies in the distinction which we do undoubtedly make<br />

between is and ought; between wh<strong>at</strong> is the case and wh<strong>at</strong><br />

ought to be. In the world th<strong>at</strong> we know by means of the<br />

senses and the intellect we can only, Kant asserts, find fact.<br />

Such a world cannot, then, contain a basis for die notion<br />

of ought; yet we do undoubtedly recognize "oughts".<br />

Therefore, the source of these "oughts" must lie in some<br />

world other than th<strong>at</strong> revealed to the semes and known by<br />

the intellect, and it must be by means of a unique faculty<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we recognize them. This faculty, which Kant calls " the<br />

moral will," not only recognizes, but feels an oblig<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />

act in accordance with the dict<strong>at</strong>es of the "ought" which<br />

it recognizes. The oblig<strong>at</strong>ion, however, though it is always<br />

open to us to give heed to it, is never compulsory; for not<br />

only is the moral will free in respect of its deliverances, but<br />

we are free to obey it or not as we please.<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> the Moral Will Prescribes. So fer, we have<br />

learnt only th<strong>at</strong> we ought to act in the way which the<br />

moral will prescribes. Can we give any indic<strong>at</strong>ion of wh<strong>at</strong><br />

it does prescribe? Kant held th<strong>at</strong> we could. Wh<strong>at</strong> the<br />

moral will prescribes is th<strong>at</strong> we should act in every case<br />

upon general principles which are intuitively recognized<br />

to be morally binding. These general principles are of the<br />

kind which every man acknowledges irrespective of his<br />

needs and circumstances; for example, th<strong>at</strong> lying is wrong,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> promises should be kept, th<strong>at</strong> kindness is better than<br />

cruelty, honesty better than deceit, and so forth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!