04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM STATED 21<br />

him, if he transgress the ordinances of society. Morality,<br />

then, which we may identify with law-abiding conduct, is<br />

not n<strong>at</strong>ural to human n<strong>at</strong>ure; it is the offspring of convention,<br />

an offspring born not ofa n<strong>at</strong>ural preference for doing<br />

right as compared with doing wrong, but of the consequences<br />

with which society has taken care to visit socially<br />

injurious conduct. Thus society is based upon a contract,<br />

expressed or implied, by which every man gives up his<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural right to "aggress against " his fellows on condition<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they give up their n<strong>at</strong>ural rights to "aggress against"<br />

him. The above argument is one which recurs frequently<br />

in the writings of political theorists. The particular form<br />

in which I have just summarized it follows fairly closely<br />

the reasoning of Hobbes, 1 the most consistently logical of<br />

all the exponents of the view th<strong>at</strong> society is based upon a<br />

compact or contract.<br />

Gyges's Ring. To return to Pl<strong>at</strong>o's exposition of the<br />

contract view of the origin of society, Glaucon proceeds<br />

to cite a legend which recalls how a certain Gyges became<br />

possessed of a ring which enabled him to become invisible<br />

<strong>at</strong> will. He was thereby placed in a position of complete<br />

irresponsibility, since, doing wh<strong>at</strong> he pleased, he was able<br />

to escape the consequences of his actions by becoming<br />

invisible. So he killed the king and took the king's wife<br />

and proceeded to establish the absolute rule of a despot<br />

whose sole object is the gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion of his own caprices.<br />

Now is there anybody, asks Glaucon, in effect, who, given<br />

a similar immunity, would not behave in a similar manner?<br />

Let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> we could act precisely as we pleased<br />

without let or hindrance. Would we really behave as we<br />

do? And if honesty compels us to admit th<strong>at</strong> we would<br />

not, are we not conceding the truth of Glaucon's main<br />

contention th<strong>at</strong> nobody is moral from choice, but only<br />

because of his fear of the consequences, by means of<br />

wtych society has taken care to deter him from being any-<br />

*See Chapter XIII, pp. 479-478, for an account of HobWi<br />

political theory*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!