04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ETHICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY SURVEYED<br />

investig<strong>at</strong>ion can, in other words, be tre<strong>at</strong>ed by reason<br />

just as the raw m<strong>at</strong>erial of any science is tre<strong>at</strong>ed by reason,<br />

the function of reason being to clarify this raw m<strong>at</strong>erial,<br />

and to derive from it principles of conduct. But it does not,<br />

therefore, follow th<strong>at</strong> the raw m<strong>at</strong>erial or subject m<strong>at</strong>ter of<br />

ethical reasoning, th<strong>at</strong>, in other words, about which reason<br />

reasons, is itself provided by reason. It does not even follow<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is in the strict sense of the word reasonable. The raw<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial of ethics is provided by the deliverances of man's<br />

moral consciousness; these are the subject m<strong>at</strong>ter for<br />

theorizing in ethics, just<br />

as the behaviour of m<strong>at</strong>ter is<br />

the iuBject m<strong>at</strong>ter for theorizing in physics. Consequently,<br />

we can neither ignore ethical intuitions, nor is there any<br />

court of appeal other than the deliverances of the moral<br />

consciousness of mankind to which we can turn for a<br />

decision on m<strong>at</strong>ters of conduct which are in dispute.<br />

The utilitarians do not in fact ignore intuitions. It is, for<br />

example, as we have seen, 1 to the popular consciousness<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they turn for their first premise th<strong>at</strong> pleasure, and<br />

pleasure alone,<br />

(ii)<br />

is desirable.<br />

THAT OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM MAKES<br />

USE OF UNAVOWED INTUITIONS. Hence, our<br />

second criticism of Objective Utilitarianism is th<strong>at</strong> although<br />

it explicitly disavows them, Utilitarianism no less than<br />

Intuitionism, entails the acceptance of intuitions. The<br />

fact, explicitly recognized by the most clearheaded of<br />

the utilitarians, Sidgwick, is admitted grudgingly, or not <strong>at</strong><br />

all, by Mill and JBentham, who look askance <strong>at</strong> intuitions<br />

as the source of lazy thinking and obscurantist conclusion.<br />

But if the validity of ultim<strong>at</strong>e and, as I have ventured to<br />

call them, indefensible intuitions is to be admitted, wh<strong>at</strong><br />

justific<strong>at</strong>ion is there for limiting our intuitions to thote which<br />

are explicitly or implicitly recognized by the utilitarians? I<br />

have just drawn <strong>at</strong>tention to the existence ofwh<strong>at</strong> appears to<br />

be a widespread intuition to the effect th<strong>at</strong> certain <strong>at</strong>titudes<br />

of mind and the actions proceeding therefrom are valuable<br />

See Chapter IX, pp. 344, 345*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!