04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248<br />

ETHICS<br />

for this reason, some physicists show an increasing disposition<br />

to dispense with the notion of determinism<br />

in fields in which its efficacy has hitherto been unquestion-<br />

ingly postul<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

(2) and (3) Criticism of the Arguments for Determinism<br />

Based upon a Consider<strong>at</strong>ion of the Mind-Body Problem<br />

the Conclusion^ of the Special Sciences<br />

The Necessary Assumptions of Science. The<br />

arguments for determinism based upon conclusions<br />

derived from a consider<strong>at</strong>ion of the rel<strong>at</strong>ions between the<br />

mind and the body, also involve certain metaphysical<br />

assumptions, though these are less easy to detect than the<br />

to the n<strong>at</strong>ure of caus<strong>at</strong>ion which<br />

assumption in regard<br />

underlies the mechanist view of the universe.<br />

Of these assumptions two are important. There is the<br />

assumption, first, th<strong>at</strong> all things may be adequ<strong>at</strong>ely re*<br />

garded as the sum total of their constituent parts and a<br />

nothing more than this sum total. There is the assumption,<br />

secondly, of the universal validity of wh<strong>at</strong>, in a previous<br />

chapter, I have called the mode of explan<strong>at</strong>ion in terms<br />

of 1<br />

origins. The first of these assumptions has, by implic<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

been rejected in Chapter II,* where I pointed out<br />

various senses in which some wholes may be regarded as<br />

being more than the sums of their parts* The second assumption<br />

implicitly denies the efficacy of teleological<br />

modes of explan<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Both assumptions are necessary assumptions of scientific<br />

method* Th<strong>at</strong> this is so may be seen by reflecting on the<br />

function of science. The function of science is to classify<br />

and predict In order th<strong>at</strong> it may effectively perform this<br />

function, it must take the objects with which it deals to<br />

pieces in order to find out wh<strong>at</strong> are their component parts.<br />

Observing th<strong>at</strong> the pieces into which it has broken up some<br />

initially unknown thing which happens to be under in*<br />

veitigajtion are of the same kind as the pieces of some<br />

other thing whose behaviour it already knows, science<br />

*See Chapter I, pp. 98-29. *See Chapter II, pp. 50-54.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!