04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184<br />

Ernies<br />

in other words, entails a subordin<strong>at</strong>ion of the particular<br />

impulses to the principle of cool Self-love.<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ement of Psychological Egoism. Butler's position<br />

entails th<strong>at</strong> some of our actions may be undertaken with<br />

an object other than th<strong>at</strong> of increasing our own happiness;<br />

it entails, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, a denial ofPsychological Hedonism* 1<br />

Some impulses, such as the ttnpiilf^ to ring in the b<strong>at</strong>h,<br />

have no object <strong>at</strong> all; in the case of others, such as the<br />

impulse to boast, the object of the impulse is the gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

peculiar to itself. Such gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion may be inimical,<br />

it may even be consciously inimical, to happiness.<br />

Butler develops this point with special reference to the<br />

ethical doctrines of the philosopher, Thomas Hobbes,<br />

whose views are summarised in Chapter X. Ethically<br />

Hobbes was wh<strong>at</strong> is known as an egoist. Egoism may be<br />

defined as the view th<strong>at</strong> all our actions have as their<br />

recognized object die production of some change in the<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e of the agent, and th<strong>at</strong> all our sentiments resolve<br />

themselves on analysis into a concern for the well-being<br />

of the person feeling the sentiments. There is, in other<br />

words, if the egoist is right, no such thing as a disinterested<br />

action, or a disinterested feeling. The arguments by<br />

which this view is supported are not in essence different<br />

from those which I have briefly summarised in Chapter II 1<br />

in defence of Hedonism, and which will be elabor<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

l<strong>at</strong>er in gre<strong>at</strong>er detail in Chapter XI. Psychological<br />

Hedonism is indeed, a special case of Psychological Egoism.<br />

While Egoism maintains th<strong>at</strong> all actions are designed to<br />

produce some change in the st<strong>at</strong>e of the agent, Hedonism<br />

asserts th<strong>at</strong> all actions have as their object th<strong>at</strong> particular<br />

kind of change which consists in an increase of the agent's<br />

pleasure. It is obvious th<strong>at</strong> the change in a man's condition<br />

which, if the egoist is right, a man's action is<br />

cases out of a<br />

designed to promote, will in ninety-nine<br />

x For a definition of Psychological as opposed to Ethical Hedonism,<br />

see Chapter XI, p. 597.<br />

Sec Chapter II, pp. 46-48.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!