04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

556<br />

POLITICS<br />

problem of the duty of the good man in the bad St<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

As we have seen, 1 a substantial body of opinion represented<br />

in all the ages has urged th<strong>at</strong> a man has a right to revolt<br />

against the St<strong>at</strong>e which viol<strong>at</strong>es his conscience. If 9 however,<br />

we admit this right, we are, as I pointed out in discussing<br />

Spencer's theory of the St<strong>at</strong>e, conceding the right to<br />

anarchy; for since, to every man who has a grievance,<br />

virtue seems to reside in himself and wickedness in the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, and since between the individual and the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

there can be no impartial judge, the right to revolt entails<br />

the right to be one's own judge of the occasions on which<br />

the right to revolt may be justifiably exercised. If, on the<br />

other hand, we* insist th<strong>at</strong> the individual must toe the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e's line, while holding <strong>at</strong> the same time, a moral theory<br />

of the St<strong>at</strong>e, which Tp^intain f as Green maintained,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the citizen has a right to the good life and th<strong>at</strong> it is<br />

the function of the St<strong>at</strong>e to enable him to exercise this<br />

right,<br />

forgo<br />

our insistence means th<strong>at</strong> the individual must<br />

the pursuit of those ends which seem to him to<br />

be good, must forgo, in other words, the pursuit of the<br />

very ends for the sake of which the St<strong>at</strong>e is agreed to<br />

exist.<br />

For this dilemma Green offers no adequ<strong>at</strong>e solution.<br />

He points out very properly th<strong>at</strong> many of die individual's<br />

rights can only be pursued in harmony with others. To<br />

insist upon his right to pursue ideal ends, when such<br />

insistence entails disobedience and revolt against the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, is to jeopardize all the other rights, freedom from<br />

violence, security under the law, unrestricted combin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with his fellows, and so forth, which the individual, in<br />

common with other members of society, enjoys ; to jeopardize<br />

these rights not only for himself, but for others. Green's<br />

suggestion is, then, th<strong>at</strong> an individual placed in the dilemma<br />

which I have imagined, would be well advised to hold hi*<br />

hand until he has succeeded in educ<strong>at</strong>ing public opinion<br />

up to die level of his own insight, and then, with a majority<br />

behind him, to proceed gradually to modify the pontive<br />

'Seepp. 544, 545 *bove.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!