04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330<br />

* ETHICS<br />

sort of pleasure and if so, which sort is the most valuable? "<br />

"<br />

The second is, Whose pleasure is it th<strong>at</strong> is entitled to be<br />

taken into account? " I propose to consider Mill's answers<br />

to each of these questions separ<strong>at</strong>ely.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> there are Different Qualities of Pleasure and th<strong>at</strong><br />

we Ought to Cultiv<strong>at</strong>e the Higher* Bentham refuses,<br />

to make any distinction between kinds or qualities of<br />

pleasure. On his view only quantity of pleasure requires<br />

to be taken into account. If one pleasure is gre<strong>at</strong>er than<br />

another then, he held, it is the superior in point of worth.<br />

This position is summed up in Bentham's famous aphorism,<br />

"All other things being equal, push-pin is as good as<br />

poetry." In other words, so long as men are really happy,<br />

the source of their happiness is imm<strong>at</strong>erial. This doctrine<br />

is logical and consistent, for if our scale of value is marked<br />

out only in units of pleasure, quantity of pleasure is the<br />

only value th<strong>at</strong> we can measure.<br />

This view was severely criticized on the score of<br />

immorality. Surely, it was said, some pleasures, those of<br />

the good man, for example, or the man of good taste,<br />

or the scholar, or the sage, are intrinsically more valuable<br />

than those of the pig or of the debauchee? Mill agreed<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they were. He pointed out th<strong>at</strong> the best men who<br />

have access to every kind of pleasure do, as a m<strong>at</strong>ter of<br />

fact, prefer certain pleasures to others. These preferred<br />

pleasures taken in sum constitute wh<strong>at</strong> is in effect an ideal<br />

which we recognize as being possessed of superior worth.<br />

"Of two pleasures," he writes, "... if one of the two is,<br />

by those who are competently acquainted with both,<br />

placed s6 far above the other th<strong>at</strong> they prefer it, even<br />

though knowing it to be <strong>at</strong>tended with a gre<strong>at</strong>er amount of dis-<br />

content," (my italics) "and would not resign it for any<br />

quantity of the other pleasure which their n<strong>at</strong>ure is<br />

capable of, we are justified in ascribing to the preferred<br />

enjoyment a superiority of quality, so far outweighing<br />

quantity as to render it, in comparison, of small account."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!