04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I5O<br />

ETHICS<br />

would fill several votaries. But I am led to believe th<strong>at</strong><br />

the proposition is true as the result of looking up the train<br />

in a time-table! and I come to know th<strong>at</strong> it is true by being<br />

<strong>at</strong> King's Gross and seeing the Edinburgh train leave the<br />

pl<strong>at</strong>form <strong>at</strong> 10 a.m. In other words, wh<strong>at</strong> I mean by saying<br />

of a thing th<strong>at</strong> it is of a certain sort, by saying, for example,<br />

of an action th<strong>at</strong> it is right, is one thing; the way ia which<br />

I come to know th<strong>at</strong> the thing is of th<strong>at</strong> sort, is another.<br />

Clearly, then, the answer to the question, "wh<strong>at</strong> do I mean<br />

by saying th<strong>at</strong> an action is right?" is wholly different from<br />

the answer to the question, "how am I led to recognize<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the action is right?" And the answer to the question,<br />

"how am I led to recognize th<strong>at</strong> an action is right?", is<br />

again different from the answer to the question, "to wh<strong>at</strong><br />

standard ought I to appeal in order to establish the fact<br />

of its tightness?"<br />

By similar methods it could, I think, be shown th<strong>at</strong> all<br />

the groups of questions which I enunci<strong>at</strong>ed above are, <strong>at</strong><br />

least prima facie, distinct groups. At any r<strong>at</strong>e, when the<br />

subject m<strong>at</strong>ter is as complex and confusing as th<strong>at</strong> of<br />

ethics, everything is to be gained by tre<strong>at</strong>ing them as if<br />

they were distinct. Yet so to tre<strong>at</strong> them is in practice ex*<br />

ceedingly difficult. Setting out to discuss the criterion or<br />

standard of tightness, the philosopher is disconcerted to<br />

find th<strong>at</strong> he is in feet discussing the meaning of a right<br />

action, while enquiries into the n<strong>at</strong>ure of moral virtue are<br />

apt to transform themselves into specul<strong>at</strong>ions upon the n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

of all kinds of good, aesthetic and intellectual as well as<br />

moral. Ifwe are to think clearly it is essential th<strong>at</strong> we should<br />

know precisely wh<strong>at</strong> it is th<strong>at</strong> we are trying to think about,<br />

and this tendency on the part of the object ofone's thought<br />

to turn into some allied, but slightly different, object, makes<br />

thinking clearly on the subject of ethics certainly no less<br />

difficult than thinking clearly in any other sphere.<br />

(4) THAT <strong>THE</strong> MEANINGS ATTRIBUTED <strong>TO</strong> WORDS USBD<br />

IN ETHICAL DISCUSSION OFTEN BEG <strong>THE</strong> QUESTIONS DIS-<br />

CUSSED. The requirement of clear thinking also demands

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!