04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUBJECTIVIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY OP ETHICS 357<br />

which happens to be the object of appetite or desire".<br />

Although it forms part of a very different philosophy,<br />

the conclusions ofSpinoza's ethical theory are not dissimilar,<br />

and a brief summary will suffice.<br />

Metaphysically, Spinoza may be classed as an absolute<br />

monist; be maintained, th<strong>at</strong> is to. say, th<strong>at</strong> the universe<br />

was a single unity which was God, and th<strong>at</strong> everything<br />

which exists is an aspect or an expression of this fundamental<br />

divine unity. Apart from the whole which is God,<br />

the individual is nothing; his being is derived wholly from<br />

God, of whose n<strong>at</strong>ure he is a partial expression. But<br />

although only an item in the whole which is God, the<br />

individual nevertheless plays within th<strong>at</strong> whole a necessary<br />

and essential role. For although he is only a partial<br />

expression of God, if it were not for him, God would not<br />

be wh<strong>at</strong> He is, his completion being necessary to God's.<br />

It is, therefore, a law of the individual's n<strong>at</strong>ure, th<strong>at</strong> he<br />

should struggle to preserve his integrity as an individual<br />

within the all-pervading one-ness of the universe, th<strong>at</strong><br />

he should struggle, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, to affirm his, right<br />

to realize hjfnmclft Thus the fundamental law of the<br />

individual's n<strong>at</strong>ure, a law whose oper<strong>at</strong>ions he cannot<br />

escape, is a law of effort and struggle, and since there<br />

cannot be effort and struggle without desire, it is a law<br />

also of desire. Starting from very different presuppositions,<br />

Spinoza thus reaches a position which, so for as its psychological<br />

and ethical corollaries are concerned, is little<br />

different from th<strong>at</strong> of Hobbes. Man is a determined being,<br />

in the sense th<strong>at</strong> he is completely determined by the laws<br />

of his being. The word "good" has no meaning apart<br />

from the individuals who use it. Absolutely and objectively<br />

there is no such thing as good, nor have our ethical con-<br />

cepts any meaning in the outside world; there is only the<br />

good for me and the good for you, and the good for me,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> which I call good, is wh<strong>at</strong>ever assists my endeavour<br />

to preserve my* own being and further my realiz<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

myself as an individual. Now wh<strong>at</strong>ever tends to further<br />

my self-realiz<strong>at</strong>ion, to make me, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!