04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM 321<br />

concluded; be in the last resort intuitive. I shall return<br />

to the significance of this point l<strong>at</strong>er. 1 In addition, how-<br />

ever, to the general intuitions of value which are entailed<br />

in any assessment of the worth of consequences, the more<br />

clearsighted of utilitarian writers have recognized th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

number of other intuitions are involved in ethical judgments.<br />

Sidgwick's tre<strong>at</strong>ment of the subject affords a good<br />

example of such recognition.<br />

Sidgwick (1838-1900)<br />

is a utilitarian in the sense th<strong>at</strong><br />

he believes th<strong>at</strong> the ethical value of an action is established<br />

by reference to its ability to promote agreeable and<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfied st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness. He is also a hedonist in<br />

the sense th<strong>at</strong> he believes happiness to be the only<br />

thing which is ultim<strong>at</strong>ely valuable, although he thinks<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is our duty to promote everybody's happiness<br />

equally, and not to give a preference to our own. In spite,<br />

however, of his general utilitarian standpoint, he maintains<br />

th<strong>at</strong> our ethical judgments always involve some intuitions,<br />

and he is anxious to show wh<strong>at</strong> these are. In the course<br />

of his tre<strong>at</strong>ment he makes a number of valuable observa-<br />

tions on the morality of the ordinary man. This, he holds,<br />

is in the main intuitional. It is intuitional in the sense<br />

th<strong>at</strong> certain intrinsic characteristics of actions are regarded<br />

by the commonsensc man as establishing the tightness or<br />

wrongness of those actions. Cruelty, in fact, in the view<br />

of common sense, is wrong, because it is cruelty; lying<br />

because it is lying. (This does not, of course, alter the fact<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the ordinary man will often condone lying or cruelty<br />

in particular cases, and justify himself by an appeal to<br />

the consequences, which are then made the subject of<br />

another intuition. Thus lying, he holds, is permissible to<br />

save a life, cruelty- although he would not call it cruelty<br />

to discipline a character. The intuitions here entailed<br />

are th<strong>at</strong> lives are worth while and ought to continue, and<br />

th<strong>at</strong> strong characters are valuable and ought to be<br />

formed.)<br />

LM<br />

1 See Chapter XII, pp. 419-496.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!