04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

324<br />

ETHICS<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ement of Utilitarianism : The Meaning of the Term<br />

1<br />

"Right Action '. Utilitarianism is a perfectly clear and<br />

understandable doctrine and is capable of being st<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

summary form. As expounded by those philosophers with<br />

whom its name is chiefly associ<strong>at</strong>ed, it seeks to provide an<br />

answer to two questions* First, wh<strong>at</strong> do we mean by<br />

a right action? This it answers by saying th<strong>at</strong> a right<br />

action is the one which, of all those which are open to<br />

the agent, has on the whole the best consequences. The<br />

reasons which the utilitarian adduces in support of this<br />

answer have already been incidentally mentioned in the<br />

course of the criticism of Intuitionism in the last Chapter,<br />

where I endeavoured to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e the impossibility of<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ing the judgment of an action from the judgment of<br />

its consequences, if only because of the impossibility of<br />

isol<strong>at</strong>ing the action from its consequences. 1 Jeremy Bentham<br />

(1748-1832), who may be regarded as the founder of<br />

modern Utilitarianism, is particularly severe in his strictures<br />

upon the willingness evinced by so many of his<br />

predecessors to take some consider<strong>at</strong>ion other* than the<br />

consequences of an action into account, when judging<br />

its worth.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> Happiness Alone is Good* The second question<br />

which Utilitarianism seeks to answer is the question,<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> consequences are valuable; and to this it answers<br />

th<strong>at</strong> happiness is alone valuable. Combining the two<br />

answers we reach the result th<strong>at</strong>, in the words of John<br />

Stuart Mill, "actions are right in proportion as they tend<br />

to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the<br />

reverse of happiness." When, therefore, a utilitarian wanted<br />

to know whether an action was right, all th<strong>at</strong> he had to<br />

consider was its happiness-producing qualities; he then<br />

pronounced th<strong>at</strong> action to be right which had the property<br />

1<br />

ofpromoting happiness. This is the standard of "utility* to<br />

which Bentham and his followers invariably appeal,<br />

when seeking to adjudge the moral worth of an action,<br />

1 See Chapter VIII, pp. 287-289.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!