04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> 8COPB OF ETHICS 155<br />

and, if he is a physicist, enumer<strong>at</strong>ing the <strong>at</strong>omic constituents<br />

of the elements. In so far as the word "good"<br />

can from his point of view be said to have any meaning<br />

<strong>at</strong> all, one picture is as "good" as another. The art critic,<br />

however, concerning himself with the aesthetic qualities<br />

of the picture, will pronounce one picture to be better<br />

than another in point of aesthetic merit. Thus the art<br />

critic measures and assigns marks for merit, whereas the<br />

scientist merely investig<strong>at</strong>es and analyses. But wh<strong>at</strong> the<br />

ethical philosopher is judging about when he assesses<br />

st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness from the point of view of their good-<br />

ness or badness, is different from the object of the psycholegist's<br />

enquiry, when he analyses st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness.<br />

The ethical philosopher approaches actions and st<strong>at</strong>es of<br />

consciousness in the way in which the art critic approaches<br />

pictures, while the psychologist's approach is th<strong>at</strong> of the<br />

scientist. Ethics and aesthetics are for this reason sometimes<br />

called "norm<strong>at</strong>ive", th<strong>at</strong> is to say, measuring studies.<br />

. METAPHYSICS<br />

AND <strong>THE</strong>OLOGY. Metaphysics and theo-<br />

logy are two branches of study, or if, in the case of the<br />

l<strong>at</strong>ter, the term knowledge be preferred, of knowledge,<br />

which also encroach upon the sphere of ethics. Metaphysics<br />

is concerned with the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the universe as a<br />

whole. Is there, the metaphysician asks, a world of reality<br />

which underlies the familiar, everyday world known to<br />

us by means of our senses, and is the familiar, everyday<br />

world an aspect of this reality? If, as many metaphysicians<br />

have thought, this is in fact the case, then the familiar<br />

world will derive the fe<strong>at</strong>ures which we discern in it<br />

from the real world which underlies and informs it Another<br />

question which metaphysics discusses is th<strong>at</strong> of cosmic<br />

purpose. Can the universe as a whole be said to have a<br />

purpose? If so, wh<strong>at</strong> part,<br />

if any, have we to play in its<br />

promotion? Further, in wh<strong>at</strong> terms is the purpose to be<br />

conceived? As a gre<strong>at</strong>er moral perfection? A higher<br />

degree of consciousness? Or a more intim<strong>at</strong>e communion<br />

with God? It is clear th<strong>at</strong> the answers which we give

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!