04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5IO<br />

POLITICS<br />

and such a will, if it existed, would fulfil most of the re-<br />

quirements which Rousseau specifies for the manifest<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of the General Will. Thus in the idealist theory of the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

to be described in a l<strong>at</strong>er chapter, Rousseau's General Will<br />

becomes identified with the Will of the St<strong>at</strong>e, the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

being conceived as a living organism, which is a whole or<br />

unity, and which stands to its constituent members in the<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ion in which the whole or unity which is a living<br />

human body stands to its constituent organs.<br />

Some of the Consequences of Rousseau's Doctrine of the<br />

Will. The consequences ofthis doctrine are in the highest<br />

degree formidable. Because the General Will is always<br />

right and always disinterested, it is argued th<strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

is always right and always disinterested. The will of the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e is, therefore, held to be morally superior to th<strong>at</strong> of<br />

any individual, and it is urged th<strong>at</strong> the individual's will<br />

may justifiably be subordin<strong>at</strong>ed to it Again, the living<br />

organism i*, it is obvious, more important than its component<br />

organs; their function is to promote its welfare,<br />

and their sole excellence consists in promoting its welfare<br />

as folly as possible. Therefore, by analogy, the St<strong>at</strong>e is<br />

more important than the individuals who compose it;<br />

their excellence is to be found in its service and their<br />

raison d'ttoe in the promotion of its interests. This principle<br />

is familiar in the Nazi philosophy which domin<strong>at</strong>es Ger-<br />

many to-day. The individual, Nazis maintain, belongs<br />

from birth to de<strong>at</strong>h to the St<strong>at</strong>e; the individual's priv<strong>at</strong>e<br />

interest must, therefore, be subordin<strong>at</strong>ed to the interest<br />

of the St<strong>at</strong>e, which is not only an end in itself, but is the<br />

synthesis of all ends, moral and spiritual. Such, broadly, is<br />

the conclusion of the line of thought which, starting from<br />

Rousseau's doctrine of the General Will, culmin<strong>at</strong>es in the<br />

idealist theory ofthe St<strong>at</strong>e and finds oneofits expressions in the<br />

practice of N<strong>at</strong>ional Socialism in contemporary Germany.<br />

There is, I would suggest, another strand in the rope<br />

which bridges the gap between Rousseau's political<br />

theory and the doctrines of modern Totalitarianism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!