04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> ETHIC? OF SOCRATES AND PLA<strong>TO</strong> 49<br />

not the case th<strong>at</strong> the brave man is never afraid. Every<br />

man has a n<strong>at</strong>ural tendency to shrink from storming a<br />

with which the<br />

hill crowned by a line of machine-guns<br />

enemy are sweeping its slopes. "There is only one universal<br />

passion/' says Napoleon in Shaw's play, The Man ofDestiny,<br />

"fear. Of all the thousand qualities a man may have,<br />

the only one you will find as certainly in the youngest<br />

drummer boy in my army as in me is fear. But," he<br />

continues, "it is fear th<strong>at</strong> makes men fight." For, in spite<br />

of their fear, soldiers do in fact advance, rush the slopes<br />

and capture the enemy's guns. Why do they? Because,<br />

says Socr<strong>at</strong>es, they are more afraid of some things, even<br />

than they are of the guns of the enemy. Of wh<strong>at</strong> things?<br />

Of such things, for example, as the doing of wh<strong>at</strong> is dis-<br />

graceful, of feeling shame, of the reput<strong>at</strong>ion for cowardice,<br />

of dishonouring the regiment, of betraying their comrades.<br />

And in case these psychological fears should not be suffi-<br />

cient, generals have taken care to ensure th<strong>at</strong> they shall<br />

be backed by a system of discipline, which trains every<br />

soldier to carry constantly <strong>at</strong> the back of his mind the<br />

thought of a court-martial for cowardice, if he runs away<br />

in the face of the enemy. Thus, as somebody remarked<br />

during the last war, "discipline is a device for substituting<br />

the certainty of being shot if you don't -go 'over the top,'<br />

for the possibility of being shot if you do", the result being<br />

th<strong>at</strong> soldiers go 'over the top/ However this may be, the<br />

point upon which Socr<strong>at</strong>es insists, in the Dialogue called<br />

the Laches, is th<strong>at</strong> the brave man no less than the coward<br />

is afraid. Why, then, does he differ from a coward ? Because,<br />

says Socr<strong>at</strong>es, he is afraid of different things, and the<br />

things he fears, the doing of wh<strong>at</strong> is disgraceful and so<br />

on, are such as he ought to be afraid of. They are, th<strong>at</strong><br />

is to say, truly formidable while the other things, the enemy's<br />

guns, are such as ought to be faced. The brave<br />

man in fact knows wh<strong>at</strong> is truly formidable, while the<br />

coward does not ; thus the difference between the brave man<br />

and the coward is one of knowledge or insight. One knows<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> ought to be feared and the other does not.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!