04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRITICISM OF IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY 733<br />

"the St<strong>at</strong>e" or "the St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>at</strong> such" are employed, their<br />

use is th<strong>at</strong> of a class name intended to denote any member<br />

of the class to which they belong. The St<strong>at</strong>e is considered<br />

as a represent<strong>at</strong>ive of its class and, in Dr. Bosanquet's<br />

words, "is a brief expression for 'St<strong>at</strong>es qua St<strong>at</strong>es'.<br />

Would my critics/ 9<br />

asks Dr. Bosanquet, "find the same<br />

difficulty in the title ofa book on 'the heart', or 'the steam<br />

engine 1<br />

?"<br />

But the analogy does not hold. The n<strong>at</strong>ure and functions<br />

ofthe heart are not modified by the existence ofother hearts.<br />

The n<strong>at</strong>ure and structure of the St<strong>at</strong>e is, as I have already<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ed, profoundly- influenced by the existence of other<br />

St<strong>at</strong>es and by its rel<strong>at</strong>ions to them; nor can we hope ad-<br />

equ<strong>at</strong>ely to describe the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the St<strong>at</strong>e, unless these<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ions and the modific<strong>at</strong>ions they entail in the St<strong>at</strong>e's<br />

practice and structure are taken into account.<br />

Secondly,<br />

it is conceded th<strong>at</strong> the account of the n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

of the St<strong>at</strong>e which is given by idealist theory is not strictly<br />

true of St<strong>at</strong>es as we know diem, existing, as they do, in<br />

imperfect actuality; it is true, it is explained, only<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, in so far as it realizes its true or ideal n<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

of the<br />

<strong>THE</strong> SO-GALLED TRUE OR IDEAL NATURE<br />

OF <strong>THE</strong> STATE. The "true or ideal n<strong>at</strong>ure" of the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e is, presumably, a Ideological expression 1 to denote<br />

an organiz<strong>at</strong>ion which approxim<strong>at</strong>e* far more closely to<br />

the St<strong>at</strong>e's real n<strong>at</strong>ure than any existing St<strong>at</strong>e with which<br />

we are acquainted. It is, then, only to this ideal organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the theory purports to apply. If we enquire wh<strong>at</strong> the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e in its "true or ideal n<strong>at</strong>ure" will be like, we may<br />

find some indic<strong>at</strong>ion in the writings of fascist theorists,<br />

which suggest th<strong>at</strong> its model is to be found in the totalitarian<br />

St<strong>at</strong>es of the modern world. These <strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e represent<br />

a closer degree of approxim<strong>at</strong>ion to the St<strong>at</strong>e in its "true<br />

or ideal n<strong>at</strong>ure*' than any St<strong>at</strong>es which have hitherto<br />

existed. Totalitarian St<strong>at</strong>es are regarded as approxim<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

more closely to the perfected or "ideal n<strong>at</strong>ure' 1<br />

of the<br />

*See Chapter I, pp. 30, 31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!