04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

364<br />

*<br />

ETHIG3<br />

useful to their possessor, which cannot possibly be useful<br />

to others; for example, the possession of good taste in<br />

liter<strong>at</strong>ure or painting. We can even admire in our enemies<br />

virtues such as courage or resolution, which make them more<br />

dangerous to us.<br />

If we do not in fact value and admire qualities and characters<br />

and actions in others which do not conduce to our own<br />

advantage, then, Hume points out, the sentiment of benevolence<br />

must be a delusive appearance of something else.<br />

How, then, are we to account for this appearance? There are,<br />

Hume argues, broadly speaking, only two altern<strong>at</strong>ives. The<br />

first is th<strong>at</strong> the appearance ofthe sentiment is due to deliber<strong>at</strong>e<br />

fraud; the second th<strong>at</strong> it is due to self-deception. The first<br />

objection is dismissed as palpably absurd. If everybody<br />

knew th<strong>at</strong> there was no such thing as benevolence, it<br />

would obviously be no use trying to pretend th<strong>at</strong> there<br />

was. With regard to the possibility th<strong>at</strong> our so-called<br />

benevolence is a piece of self-deception, Hume admits<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it may be so, but asks in effect, 'wh<strong>at</strong> if it is?' For<br />

let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> it is self-deception; it would still be the<br />

case th<strong>at</strong> men think it necessary to believe th<strong>at</strong> altruism<br />

and benevolence exist and are real, even if they do not<br />

exist and are not real. Wh<strong>at</strong> is more, because of this belief<br />

they will be habitually led to perform actions which<br />

benefit others, and we shall feel approval for these actions<br />

and for the persons who do them, even if we are only<br />

approving of those who habitually deceive themselves.<br />

Hume's Subjectivism assists his argument <strong>at</strong> this point.<br />

His theory is not based on the supposition th<strong>at</strong> actions<br />

are in fact benevolent, or th<strong>at</strong> characters do possess moral<br />

worth in their own right. The basis of his theory is, it<br />

will be remembered, the fact of human approval; those<br />

things are good of which most men approve. Provided<br />

thai, th<strong>at</strong> there is human approval, provided, th<strong>at</strong> is to<br />

say, th<strong>at</strong> we do approve of actions which benefit others,<br />

or which are designed to benefit them, then benevolence<br />

is, for Hume, established. Now we undoubtedly do approve<br />

of such actions and, men are, therefore, benevolent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!