04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM OF FREE WILL 265<br />

are inherited, environmental or physiological, which cloud<br />

my judgment or undermine my will, with the result th<strong>at</strong><br />

I do not recognize wh<strong>at</strong> it is right for me to do or, having<br />

recognized wh<strong>at</strong> is right, nevertheless do something<br />

different. If freedom is a fact and I am, it will be remembered,<br />

concerned only to indic<strong>at</strong>e the minimum conditions<br />

which must be s<strong>at</strong>isfied, if freedom is a fact it will consist<br />

in just this ability to elimin<strong>at</strong>e the influence of the factors<br />

which science emphasizes, so th<strong>at</strong> my judgment can give<br />

an unhampered verdict upon wh<strong>at</strong> is right, and my will<br />

then proceed to realize in action th<strong>at</strong> of which my judg-<br />

ment approves. Thus to act freely will, on this view, be<br />

to do wh<strong>at</strong> one's judgment, uninfluenced by the bias of<br />

inherited or environmental factors, tells one th<strong>at</strong> one ought<br />

to do. We may thus fine down the issue of our discussion<br />

to this single question, are we ever in this sense free?<br />

St. Thomas Aquinas on Freedom. In discussing freedom<br />

the philosopher Leibniz (1646-1716), a professed<br />

believer in free will who, nevertheless, frequently gives<br />

unwitting hostages to determinism, invokes the simile of<br />

a swinging pendulum. The pendulum, he points out,<br />

never really comes to rest; it is always swinging in one<br />

direction or the other. Similarly, the estim<strong>at</strong>es and judgments<br />

of the human mind are never completely unbiased;<br />

they are always inclined in one direction or another, and<br />

they are inclined from the start. I mention the simile<br />

because, if it is apposite, if, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, human n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

is in fact like a swinging pendulum, which is never <strong>at</strong> rest,<br />

then the belief in free will must be surrendered. For the<br />

minimum condition of free will is th<strong>at</strong> there should be a<br />

period of deliber<strong>at</strong>ion during which we compare the various<br />

altern<strong>at</strong>ive courses of action which arc before us, and<br />

weigh and estim<strong>at</strong>e their respective merits, while not, as<br />

yet, inclining to any one. A phrase of St. Thomas Aquinas's<br />

(1227-1274) clearly brings out the n<strong>at</strong>ure of this unbiased<br />

period of deliber<strong>at</strong>ion. While I am weighing the various<br />

altern<strong>at</strong>ives, comparing their respective merits and wonder-<br />

Ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!