04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

154<br />

ETHICS<br />

human consciousness. Some writers hold th<strong>at</strong> nothing is<br />

either good or bad excejrt st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

a world without consciousness would be a world without<br />

ethics* However this may be, it is clear th<strong>at</strong> the moral<br />

judgments passed by individuals, their valu<strong>at</strong>ions of<br />

good and bad, the tempt<strong>at</strong>ions to which they are exposed,<br />

and the moral conflicts through which they pass, are facts<br />

with which ethics is intim<strong>at</strong>ely concerned. All these facts<br />

are mental facts; they are events which take place in<br />

human minds. Now psychology is the science which<br />

takes for its province the human mind. To the psychologist<br />

all mental events are of interest. They constitute, indeed,<br />

his especial and peculiar concern and among them, therefore,<br />

are included those events which also form part of<br />

the subject m<strong>at</strong>ter of ethics. How, then, is ethics to be dis-<br />

tinguished from psychology?<br />

The line of demarc<strong>at</strong>ion which is usually drawn is as<br />

follows. The purpose of psychology, it is said, is to examine<br />

and to classify all mental events without seeking to assess<br />

their value. It is enough for a psychologist th<strong>at</strong> a mental<br />

event should occur; he is not concerned to ask whether it<br />

ought to occur or whether, when either of two mental<br />

events might have occurred, it is better th<strong>at</strong> one should<br />

have done so than the other. Now it is precisely with the<br />

issues raised by the words "ought" and "better" th<strong>at</strong><br />

ethics is concerned. Ethics does not, in other words, merely<br />

register and explore st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness; it assesses them,<br />

affirming as a result of its assessment th<strong>at</strong> some are more<br />

desirable than others; th<strong>at</strong> some ought to occur, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

others ought not to occur. Ethics is thus committed, as<br />

psychology is not, to the task of trying to give some mean-<br />

ing to such words as V ought" and "desirable".<br />

An analogy may help to elucid<strong>at</strong>e the point. There are<br />

<strong>at</strong> least two ways in which we can give an account of a<br />

picture; there is the way of the scientist, and the way of<br />

the art critic. The scientist will analyse the m<strong>at</strong>ter of<br />

which the picture is composed, resolving its paint and<br />

canvas into their chemical compounds and elements,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!