04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> SCOPE OP ETHICS 165<br />

approved. Theories ofthe first type may be called objective*<br />

intuitioniflt theories; of the second, subjective-intuitionitt<br />

theories. Similarly with utilitarian theories. A right action,<br />

says the utilitarian, is one which has the best consequences;<br />

but "best" may be interpreted objectively, to mean th<strong>at</strong><br />

wh<strong>at</strong> is "best" is wh<strong>at</strong> it is independently of any opinion<br />

th<strong>at</strong> any person or body of persons may entertain in regard<br />

to mean<br />

to it, or "best" may be interpreted subjectively<br />

th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is " best " is " ' '<br />

best only because and in so far as<br />

people desire or approve of it. To say ofconsequences th<strong>at</strong><br />

they are the "best" will mcarf, on this l<strong>at</strong>ter view, merely<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they have obtained more approval or gr<strong>at</strong>ified more<br />

desires in all or most of a particular class of people than<br />

the consequences which would have followed any alter-<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ive action th<strong>at</strong> was open to the agent*<br />

In the succeeding Chapters, I shall briefly outline some<br />

of the represent<strong>at</strong>ive theories in each of these four groups,<br />

namely, objective-intuitionist, objective-utilitarian, subjective<br />

utilitarian and named.<br />

subjective-intuitionist in the order<br />

A Preliminary Doubt. Before, however, I can embark<br />

on the task of exposition, there is a preliminary doubt<br />

to be disposed of, or r<strong>at</strong>her, since it cannot be disposed of<br />

<strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e in this book, to be acknowledged. There is a<br />

point of view which insists th<strong>at</strong> writing and discussion<br />

about ethics is usually, if not always meaningless, and cannot,<br />

therefore, be fruitful. If this point of view could be<br />

successfully maintained, a gre<strong>at</strong> part of wh<strong>at</strong> follows would<br />

not need to be written.<br />

*<br />

This point of view is in essence as follows. Our views<br />

about ethical m<strong>at</strong>ters may be valid, but they are strictly<br />

incommunicable, for, although we may know wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

right and good, we cannot define or give an account ofour<br />

knowledge. The subject m<strong>at</strong>ter of ethics in fact is not to<br />

be talked or written about; it is r<strong>at</strong>her in die n<strong>at</strong>ure of an<br />

experience, unique and incommunicable, to be enjoyed*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!