04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

428<br />

'<br />

. ETHICS<br />

we can only forecast them with a gre<strong>at</strong>er or less degree of .<br />

accuracy. The point th<strong>at</strong> I have tried to establish is th<strong>at</strong><br />

a man who forecasted very inaccur<strong>at</strong>ely, so th<strong>at</strong>, with<br />

the best will in die world, he was continually performing<br />

actions which had the most unfortun<strong>at</strong>e consequences,<br />

would not be adjudged by the popular consciousness to<br />

be as morally virtuous a man as he who habitually performed<br />

actions which had good consequences. It seems,<br />

therefore, to follow th<strong>at</strong> the possession of a reasonably<br />

goodjudgment in the m<strong>at</strong>ter offorecasting the consequences<br />

of one's actions forms an essential element in the popular<br />

conception of moral virtue. On this point, I think th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

popular moral consciousness is right.<br />

(5) Conclusion th<strong>at</strong> Moral Virtue is Valued and Pursued.<br />

Although we cannot describe moral virtue, we do nevertheless<br />

desire it and seek to <strong>at</strong>tain it. Three arguments<br />

have been used in the foregoing discussions in support of<br />

this conclusion. First, there is Socr<strong>at</strong>es's argument 1 th<strong>at</strong><br />

virtue is a form of knowledge, an argument which -entails<br />

the assumption th<strong>at</strong> we do all pursue wh<strong>at</strong> Socr<strong>at</strong>es calls<br />

"the Good", and th<strong>at</strong> vice is, therefore, ignorance of wh<strong>at</strong><br />

"the Good" is. This argument was criticized on the ground<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it makes no provision for the fact th<strong>at</strong>, although we<br />

often recognize "the Good", we nevertheless perform "the<br />

evil". 1 But the fact th<strong>at</strong> we do not always or even often,<br />

pursue " the Good " we see, does not justify us in concluding<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it has no influence over u*, even when we neglect it.<br />

On the contrary, there is a part of us which would always<br />

like to do wh<strong>at</strong> we conceive to be right, and would like<br />

to behave in the way in which we think th<strong>at</strong> we ought to<br />

behave, although the part in question may be overborne<br />

by desires for specific ends, whose achievement entails<br />

conduct other than th<strong>at</strong> which we think to be right.<br />

Subsidiary arguments in favour of this conclusion which<br />

have been mentioned in the preceding pages are, first, 1<br />

1 See Chapter II,<br />

Sec<br />

pp. 48-50.<br />

Chapter VI, pp. ftift, 913.<br />

f See Chapter II, p. 51.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!