04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l66 ETHICS<br />

Ethical Nihilism. It is important to distinguish this<br />

view firom the purely sceptical <strong>at</strong>titude to ethics which<br />

underlies the group of theories th<strong>at</strong> I have termed sub-<br />

jective intuitionist. This <strong>at</strong>titude is one which in the last<br />

resort denies validity to ethical notions, and may thus<br />

be called ethical Nihilism. There is nothing good or evil<br />

in the world, it urges, but thinking makes it so, while the<br />

words right and wrong are merely the names with which<br />

men choose to dignify the things they happen to like or<br />

dislike. It follows th<strong>at</strong> those conceptions with which ethics<br />

deals, the conceptions of right and duty<br />

and moral<br />

oblig<strong>at</strong>ion and good, have no basis in the n<strong>at</strong>ure of things,<br />

nor do they own any counterpart in the universe outside<br />

men's minds. They are merely concepts which men have<br />

gener<strong>at</strong>ed and projected for their comfort and assurance<br />

upon the canvas of an ethically meaningless universe.<br />

For the universe itself the ethical nihilist might continue,<br />

is ethically neutral: it contains no principles to guide our<br />

conduct, no Being to w<strong>at</strong>ch over our endeavours, no goals<br />

to reward our efforts. It is merely the hurrying of m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

endlessly, meaninglessly. This nihilistic <strong>at</strong>titude which<br />

underlies the theories to be considered in Chapter X has<br />

the effect, as I have already hinted, of robbing ethics of<br />

all validity and meaning; for, if the terms right and wrong<br />

have no meaning in themselves, it is meaningless to say<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we ought to do the one and refrain from the other;<br />

if good and evil are not factors in the universe which<br />

exist independently of us, it is meaningless to say th<strong>at</strong> we<br />

ought to pursue the one and avoid the other.<br />

Ethical Silence. But the view which I now wish to<br />

consider is not ethical Nihilism. This view, which I propose<br />

to label "ethical Silence", admits th<strong>at</strong> ethical expressions<br />

have a meaning. It agrees, too, th<strong>at</strong> it is not impossible<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we may come to know wh<strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> meaning is; but we<br />

cannot, it asserts, communic<strong>at</strong>e it. The reason for this<br />

conclusion, a conclusion which is sometimes known as<br />

ethical Positivism, may be st<strong>at</strong>ed briefly as follows. All

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!