04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I$4<br />

ETHICS<br />

wrongness, but th<strong>at</strong> of the society to which he belongs;<br />

or, it may be of the primitive society from which the<br />

society to which he belongs has developed. Thing? which<br />

were found to be expedient by our ancestors were called<br />

good by them because they were expedient Thus a tradition<br />

arose th<strong>at</strong> certain things were good merely because over<br />

a considerable period people had agreed to call them so.<br />

This tradition became in course of time so ingrained in<br />

the consciousness of the race th<strong>at</strong> presently it began to<br />

appear as an inherited instinct This inherited instinct<br />

we call conscience. Thus* when conscience functions<br />

telling us th<strong>at</strong> action X is pght or action Y wrong,<br />

character X good or character Y bad, wh<strong>at</strong> it really<br />

means is th<strong>at</strong> X-like actions and characters were found to<br />

be to the advantage, Y-like actions and characters to the<br />

disadvantagef of the societies from which our own has<br />

developed. On this view, then, X and Y do not possess<br />

any objective ethical characteristics of their own. Hence,<br />

in judging them to be right and wrong, we are judging<br />

only th<strong>at</strong> certain persons or classes of persons entertain<br />

or once entertained certain feelings of approval and<br />

disapproval in regard<br />

to them. 1<br />

A Fourfold Division. Let us now apply this distinction<br />

between subjective and objective theories to our<br />

first grouping of ethical theories into intuitionist and utili-<br />

tarian. The subjective-objective distinction is clearly<br />

applicable to theories belonging to both groups. Intuitionist<br />

theories which affirm th<strong>at</strong> actions are right and<br />

things are good apart from their consequences may mean<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they are right and good in themselves, independently<br />

of wh<strong>at</strong> any person or body of persons thinks, or has<br />

once thought .about them, or th<strong>at</strong> they are right and<br />

good only because people think or have thought them<br />

to be o. In the first case, actions will be approved because<br />

they are seen to be moral; in the second, to say of them<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they are moral will mean merely th<strong>at</strong> they are<br />

1 See Chapter X, pp. 373-376 for * development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!