04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong>ORY OF DEMOCRACY 779<br />

society, and th<strong>at</strong> he would disapprove of them, if they were<br />

brought to his notice, does not, however, mean th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e can remain indifferent to them. As I have already<br />

pointed out in the case of actions proceeding from economic<br />

motives, 1 the individual's will is more limited than his<br />

effective environment, and for this reason and in this sense<br />

the effects of ethical teaching may be "blind", just as the<br />

effects of economic action may be "blind." Ethical beliefs<br />

may in fact be regarded from a double point of view;<br />

from th<strong>at</strong> of the extent to which they s<strong>at</strong>isfy the individual,<br />

and from th<strong>at</strong> of their effect upon the lives and conduct<br />

of other individuals. It is from this second point of view<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e takes cognizance of ethical beliefs; th<strong>at</strong> is<br />

to say, it takes cognizance of their social effects, and<br />

because these may be unintended, subversive and antisocial,<br />

it may be the business of the St<strong>at</strong>e to set bounds<br />

to their spread. Obvious examples are the effects of<br />

anarchist teaching upon policemen and civil servants,<br />

and of pacifist teaching upon the armed forces ofthe Crown.<br />

Now most St<strong>at</strong>es, including democr<strong>at</strong>ic St<strong>at</strong>es, would<br />

regard these effects as m<strong>at</strong>ters of which the St<strong>at</strong>e is bound<br />

to concern itself in its own defence.<br />

Difficulty of Drawing the Line of St<strong>at</strong>e Interference*<br />

It may be granted th<strong>at</strong> the line where St<strong>at</strong>e interference'<br />

is justified is hard to draw. Most democr<strong>at</strong>s would urge th<strong>at</strong><br />

in recent years it has been drawn too tightly, and assert<br />

th<strong>at</strong> even in democr<strong>at</strong>ic countries there has been an<br />

unjustifiable restraint of individual liberty in the fancied<br />

interests of the welfare of the St<strong>at</strong>e. The English, for<br />

example, aresupposed toset store by liberty, and Gre<strong>at</strong> Britain<br />

is generally regarded as a stronghold of individualism.<br />

Yet reflecting upon the tendency of such post-war legis-<br />

l<strong>at</strong>ion as the Public Order Act which seeks to prohibit<br />

uniforms, the Incitement to Dis-<br />

the wearing of political<br />

affection Act knbwn as the Sedition Act, the Trade Disputes<br />

Ac* regul<strong>at</strong>ing the use of Trade Union funds for political<br />

*See above, pp. 773. 774-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!