04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*68 ETHICS<br />

contribute. Nevertheless) most of those who have written<br />

upon this topic have felt themselves able to announce<br />

with some degree of unanimity th<strong>at</strong> their reasons can and<br />

do motiv<strong>at</strong>e them to action. There are two general consider<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

which may be relevantly mentioned<br />

(i) THAT <strong>THE</strong>RE is NO CLEAR-CUT DIVISION OF<br />

FACULTIES. First, no sharp division of faculties, between<br />

reason and emotion or between reason and passion, is<br />

feasible. As I pointed out when discussing Pl<strong>at</strong>o's three-<br />

fold division of the soul 1<br />

, most psychologists are agreed<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, to speak of the human psyche as if it were a bundle<br />

of faculties, as if, for example, it were or contained reason<br />

plus will plus emotion, is to falsify the facts of consciousness.<br />

We can only do justice to these facts by conceiving of the<br />

psyche as <strong>at</strong> any given moment functioning in a predominantly<br />

reasonable or a predominantly emotional way. I<br />

suggest elsewhere* th<strong>at</strong> the activity of consciousness is<br />

always in essence cognitive, th<strong>at</strong> an act of consciousness<br />

is, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, always a knowing of something other than<br />

itself upon which the activity of consciousness is directed.<br />

Whether a particular st<strong>at</strong>e of consciousness is such as we<br />

call reasonable, or whether we describe it r<strong>at</strong>her as emo-<br />

tional or appetitive depends upon the degree to which the<br />

cognitive activity of knowing is emotionally or desirefiilly<br />

coloured. The questions raised by this assertion belong to<br />

the theory of knowledge and cannot be pursued here. Wh<strong>at</strong><br />

for our present purpose is important is the recognition<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, wh<strong>at</strong>ever the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the psychological activity<br />

in which <strong>at</strong> any given moment we happen to be engaged,<br />

it is not a special faculty, for example, reason or imagin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

or emotion or desire, which is being called into play, but<br />

the whole psyche which <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> moment is expressed in<br />

the activity.<br />

As I pointed out when discussing Pl<strong>at</strong>o's theory of the<br />

soul1 it is , not the case th<strong>at</strong> the soul is divided into three<br />

1 *<br />

See Chapter II, pp. 55-57. See Chapter XI, pp. 410-412.<br />

See Chapter II, pp. 56, 57.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!