04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

356<br />

* ETHICS<br />

the agent's pleasure. Pity, as we have already seen, 1 arises<br />

from the thought th<strong>at</strong> a like calamity may befall ourselves.<br />

Laughter is a "sudden glory" caused either by something<br />

we do th<strong>at</strong> pleases us, or by the apprehension of something<br />

deformed in another, the contrast between which and our<br />

own lack of the deformity gives us pleasure. The "worth"<br />

or "value" of a man is the same as his "price", and his<br />

"price" is simply wh<strong>at</strong> another would give for the use of<br />

his power. Honour is simply "the manifest<strong>at</strong>ion of the value<br />

1 '<br />

we set<br />

on a man because ofour estim<strong>at</strong>ion of his "worth";<br />

cruelty is men's "contempt, or little sense of the calamity<br />

of others . . . proceeding from the security of their own<br />

fortune." In opposition to the Greek thinkers, Hobbes<br />

urges th<strong>at</strong> men have by n<strong>at</strong>ure no social character. They<br />

are not, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, by n<strong>at</strong>ure political and social beings;<br />

they seek society not for its own sake, but only in order<br />

th<strong>at</strong> they may enjoy its honours and win its prizes. Thus<br />

our delight in social g<strong>at</strong>herings is always self-interested<br />

we meet in order to joke <strong>at</strong> others' expense, backbite the<br />

absent, boast about ourselves and display our learning<br />

or wit. In a word, the mind of man is concerned only with<br />

its own glory; his senses with their own pleasures.<br />

Ethics of Spinoza (1637-1677). I have illustr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Hobbes's views in some little detail because his philosophy<br />

provides the most consistent and unflinching exposition<br />

of a certain type of ethical theory. This theory is egoistic.<br />

It envisages, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, some change in the st<strong>at</strong>e of<br />

the agent as the only possible motive of action. It is also<br />

hedonistic, since the st<strong>at</strong>e whose promotion is recognized<br />

as a motive is always pleasurable and only pleasurable,<br />

n<strong>at</strong>uralistic in the sense th<strong>at</strong> it is based upon an alleged<br />

scientific study of the n<strong>at</strong>ure of man as just one among<br />

the many inhabitants of the n<strong>at</strong>ural world, subject to<br />

the same laws as those which determine the behaviour<br />

of his fellow cre<strong>at</strong>ures, and iiibjectivist, in the sense th<strong>at</strong><br />

the meaning which it gives to the word "good" is "th<strong>at</strong><br />

1 See Chapter VI, p. 185.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!