04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 197<br />

the next chapter, 1 the possibility of free will turns upon the<br />

answer th<strong>at</strong> we give to it* It is plausible to suppose th<strong>at</strong><br />

we are not responsible for our feelings, and if feeling alone<br />

can motiv<strong>at</strong>e action, we are not, it would seem, responsible<br />

for our actions. In endowing Conscience with authority<br />

over action, Butler is thus taking sides on an important<br />

controversial issue, for wh<strong>at</strong>, in effect, he is saying is th<strong>at</strong><br />

Conscience has not merely the cognitive property of<br />

recognizing wh<strong>at</strong> is right and wh<strong>at</strong> wrong, but also wh<strong>at</strong><br />

may be called an "inclining" property, the property,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> is to say, of being able strongly to incline or motiv<strong>at</strong>e<br />

us to do wh<strong>at</strong> is recognized to be right. I say "strongly<br />

to incline or motiv<strong>at</strong>e", since if we were absolutely obliged<br />

to do wh<strong>at</strong> Conscience prescribed, there would be no<br />

freedom and, therefore, no such thing as moral worth.<br />

Conscience, Self-love, Benevolence all these pronounce<br />

upon the desirability or otherwise of certain courses of<br />

action, approving or disapproving according to their<br />

lights; but while Self-love disapproves on the ground<br />

th<strong>at</strong> a particular action is imprudent, and Benevolence on<br />

the ground th<strong>at</strong> it is inimical to the happiness of others,<br />

Conscience alone disapproves because it is wrong.<br />

Butler's Hierarchy of Faculties. Butler arranges his<br />

three principles in a hierarchy. Conscience is, as we have<br />

seen, the supreme principle; whether, therefore, it does<br />

or does not control the other two, it always ought to do so,<br />

and in an ideal personality it always would do so. If<br />

Self-love and Benevolence conflict, there is nothing in the<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure of either to give it authority over the other, but<br />

Conscience is endowed with an over-riding authority, and,<br />

if we will to invoke it, it will always answer our caH. We<br />

can, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, by means of Conscience, always check<br />

over-indulgence in either cool Self-love or in Benevolence;<br />

in cool Self-love on the ground th<strong>at</strong> over-indulgence<br />

is selfish, in Benevolence on the ground th<strong>at</strong> we are being<br />

tempted to neglect our own health and happiness, or even<br />

1 See Chapter VII, pp. 267-1171.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!