04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRITICISM OF IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY 757<br />

indifference which these associ<strong>at</strong>ions manifest to the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e, the altern<strong>at</strong>ive line of development for human<br />

society which they suggestaltern<strong>at</strong>ive, th<strong>at</strong> is, to the<br />

realiz<strong>at</strong>ion by existing St<strong>at</strong>es of an ever gre<strong>at</strong>er degree of<br />

"the tfue n<strong>at</strong>ure" of the St<strong>at</strong>e and the conflict of claims<br />

upon the allegiance of the individual which the existence<br />

and growth of these associ<strong>at</strong>ions entails. It disregards<br />

(b) the existing amicable rel<strong>at</strong>ions between St<strong>at</strong>es, and the<br />

extent to which the rigid demarc<strong>at</strong>ion between the<br />

boundaries and authorities of different St<strong>at</strong>es, entailed by<br />

the isol<strong>at</strong>ing tendencies of the theory, is in practice blurred<br />

and cut across.<br />

The consider<strong>at</strong>ions indic<strong>at</strong>ed above reinforced by the<br />

chaos to which the competing claims of absolute St<strong>at</strong>es<br />

has reduced the Western world have produced of recent<br />

years a powerful reaction against the idealist St<strong>at</strong>e theory.<br />

Writers have gone so far as to deny the necessity of the<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ion-St<strong>at</strong>e, and to predict its extinction. This view is, I<br />

believe, mistaken and reasons for thinking it to be so will<br />

be given in the next chapter. 1<br />

(VI) Th<strong>at</strong> Only<br />

Individuals have Personalities and<br />

Exercise Wills<br />

Part ofthe argument developed in Section C. (II) S is based<br />

on a certain assumption. The assumption is the following:<br />

it is assumed th<strong>at</strong> the argument in favour ofthe view th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e has a being and personality of its own, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

this being or personality has a will of its own, is a valid<br />

argument. Granted this assumption, I have pointed out<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the same conclusion can be applied to associ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

other than the St<strong>at</strong>e. These too, if the argument is valid,<br />

must have beings or personalities;<br />

these too must own<br />

wills; and these too, therefore, are entitled to make claims<br />

upon die individual members whose personalities they in<br />

any form, incorpor<strong>at</strong>e and transcend. But the notion th<strong>at</strong><br />

society of human beings, whether St<strong>at</strong>e or voluntary associ-<br />

<strong>at</strong>ion, has a being and penonality and exercises a will is<br />

*See Chapter XIX, pp. 774-7*7- Scc pp. 737-739

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!