04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

796<br />

ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> MODERNS<br />

self-assertive can only be decided by force. The principle<br />

th<strong>at</strong> those who can organize the gre<strong>at</strong>est amount of force<br />

on their behalf should rule, has been the principle of<br />

government which has chiefly oper<strong>at</strong>ed in the history of<br />

mankind. It is directly opposed to the principle of democracy,<br />

and I do not see any way of proving th<strong>at</strong> the one<br />

principle is superior to the other. If the superiority of the<br />

democr<strong>at</strong>ic principle is not intuitively seen, Acre is, I think,<br />

nothing th<strong>at</strong> can usefully be said in its defence. It is,<br />

however, pertinent to point out th<strong>at</strong> the results which<br />

have historically <strong>at</strong>tended the oper<strong>at</strong>ion of the former<br />

principle have not been such as to commend it to an<br />

impartial mind. If it be conceded th<strong>at</strong> there are absolute<br />

values such as truth and moral virtue, then we may say<br />

th<strong>at</strong> those human beings are superior who apprehend<br />

these values and embody them in their lives. We may also<br />

say th<strong>at</strong> by reason of their ability to apprehend values<br />

they ought to govern the St<strong>at</strong>e. This was Pl<strong>at</strong>o's view.<br />

It contradicts the principle of democracy which I have<br />

here enunci<strong>at</strong>ed, but there is, none the less, much to be<br />

said in its favour. Those who in modern times have pro*<br />

claimed the right of the superior to rule have, however,<br />

as a general rule, repudi<strong>at</strong>ed the conception of absolute<br />

values; nor have they shown any tendency<br />

to base the<br />

ruler's claim to rule upon his superior knowledge of truth<br />

and moral goodness. There is, therefore, in Totalitarian<br />

St<strong>at</strong>es, no absolute standard by reference to which the<br />

superiority of the superior can be tested, and would-be<br />

superior persons have been driven to substanti<strong>at</strong>ing their<br />

claim to superiority by force.<br />

B. The Principle of Human Frailty<br />

I mention this principle here not because it is as important<br />

as some of those which follow, but because it is based<br />

upon principle A, and is in some sense an extension of<br />

it. In opposition to all totalitarian and absolutist theories,<br />

democr<strong>at</strong>s have contended th<strong>at</strong> human beings cannot be<br />

trusted with power over their fellow human beings with-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!