04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

590<br />

POLITICS<br />

determined expressions of something which is realizing<br />

itself in and through them. To take one more example,<br />

the whole which is the p<strong>at</strong>tern of a jigsaw puzzle<br />

determines the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the design which will appear<br />

on each separ<strong>at</strong>e piece of the puzzle. 'Seen in isol<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

seen apart from the puzzle as a whole, the design on teach<br />

piece is meaningless. It is only in its rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the whole,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it assumes meaning and significance. But the whole<br />

preceded the pieces in two senses, first, as a conception in<br />

the mind of the compiler of the puzzle, secondly, as a<br />

painted p<strong>at</strong>tern on a block of wood, which is subsequently<br />

cut up into a number of separ<strong>at</strong>e pieces to be presented<br />

to the solver as the parts of the puzzle. Though, however,<br />

the movement of the son<strong>at</strong>a precedes its development, the<br />

body its actions and gestures, the government policy its<br />

realiz<strong>at</strong>ion in legisl<strong>at</strong>ive acts, the jigsaw puzzle its separ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

into pieces, nevertheless, all these are truly parts of<br />

the wholes which inform them, so th<strong>at</strong> if it were not for<br />

the parts, there would be no wholes. There is, then, a<br />

double rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between wholes and parts. On the one<br />

hand, wholes precede and determine the parts in which<br />

they express themselves; on the other, the parts taken<br />

together make up wholes, even though the whole may be<br />

more than the sum of the parts which make it up. It is<br />

this two-fold rel<strong>at</strong>ion which Hegel postul<strong>at</strong>es between<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e and individual. Individual* constitute the St<strong>at</strong>e;<br />

but the St<strong>at</strong>e informs and pervades the consciousness of<br />

the individuals through and in which it realizes itself.<br />

(4) The St<strong>at</strong>e as an Organism<br />

It follows th<strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e must, on Hegel's view, be<br />

generically conceived after the model of an organism, since<br />

the consciousness which belongs to the St<strong>at</strong>e informs and<br />

the consciousness of the individuals who are<br />

pervades<br />

parts of the St<strong>at</strong>e. It is, moreover, a moral organism in<br />

the sense th<strong>at</strong> it can be viewed ideologically by reference<br />

to the purpose which it seeks to realize, and by its success<br />

in the realiz<strong>at</strong>ion of which its worth may be assessed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!