04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BTfelCf<br />

point ofscience, ifyou know die formula for the ingredients<br />

of a man's bodily and mental constitution, you can tell<br />

how a human being will behave in such and such circumstances;<br />

for, directly you take it to pieces and examine the<br />

parts them, as we have seen, each part appears to be<br />

completely determined by the others* The assumptions<br />

involved in this tre<strong>at</strong>ment are those which have already<br />

been pointed out. It is assume*! th<strong>at</strong> a man is the sum<br />

- So<br />

total of the pieces into which he can be analysed and th<strong>at</strong><br />

he is the product of the antecedents from which he can<br />

be shown to have derived.<br />

tre<strong>at</strong>ed, a man inevitably appears to be determined.<br />

His constitution is determined by its constituent parts<br />

just because, from Ms point of view, it is the sum of its<br />

constituent parts, and his present is conditioned by his<br />

past antecedents just because, when he is so regarded, it is<br />

the outcome of his antecedents.<br />

How die Scientist Brings Himself Within the Determinist<br />

Scheme. Now these, it must again be insisted,<br />

are the only lines along which science can proceed, and<br />

in so far as science aspires to give an account of a human<br />

being, ft is within the framework of these assumptions th<strong>at</strong><br />

the account must fell. To deny the applicability of the<br />

method or the adequacy of its results, is to deny the<br />

competence of science in certain spheres. It is to say in<br />

effect *when it comes to a question of mind and soul,<br />

the scientific method is no longer fruitful; <strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e its<br />

fruitfulness is limited'. And when the scientist proceeds,<br />

if ever he does, to consider himself introspectively,<br />

his Own consciousness and asks himself whence,<br />

in spite of all his intellectual arguments, this insistent<br />

sens<strong>at</strong>ion of freedom which he undoubtedly experiences<br />

derives, he will, it must be presumed, have little difficulty<br />

in bringing himself by analogy into the determinist<br />

scheme which he has*already framed to fit his fellows.<br />

He has, we must suppose, already taken the minds of his<br />

fellows to pieces and analysed their consciousness into

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!