04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLA<strong>TO</strong>'S POLITICAL <strong>THE</strong>ORY 83<br />

Its citizens. It is the god, they the perpetual<br />

sacrifice; and their rulers are Its priests.<br />

PL. Is th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> men have made of the doctrine th<strong>at</strong><br />

the community is supreme! Wh<strong>at</strong> close bed-<br />

fellows are truth and falsehood! But you do not,<br />

I hope, accuse me of teaching so preposterous?"<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> Members of Pl<strong>at</strong>o's Guardian Class are Alone<br />

Individuals. The doctrines to which Philalcthcs refers<br />

in his last speech will be developed <strong>at</strong> gre<strong>at</strong>er length on<br />

a l<strong>at</strong>er page. 1 His criticism I believe to be in essence sound<br />

and, as Lowes Dickinson insists, it has a peculiar<br />

topical significance. It is, however, only fair to point out<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the charge of subordin<strong>at</strong>ing the individual to the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e is not one which can be substanti<strong>at</strong>ed in regard to<br />

Pl<strong>at</strong>o's Guardian class. At any r<strong>at</strong>e it is inapplicable to<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> may be called the non-civic periods in die lives of<br />

the members of this class. The Good which as philosophers<br />

they cultiv<strong>at</strong>e is an individual good albeit, as<br />

Lowes Dickinson points out, it is pursued only intermittently<br />

in the intervals of civic duty; and the <strong>at</strong>tainment<br />

of the vision of reality which is the object of their lives<br />

owes nothing but the training and leisure which make it<br />

possible to the St<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

This is true enough, and provided th<strong>at</strong> we can accept<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> amounts to a division of human beings into two<br />

species, each with its own specific good, it affords an<br />

adequ<strong>at</strong>e answer to the criticism. For the philosophic<br />

activity and the word "philosophic" may in .this connection<br />

be interpreted to include the spiritual, the intellectual,<br />

the aesthetic, the scientific, indeed all those forms<br />

of activity whose disinterested pursuit is <strong>at</strong> once the<br />

distinction and the glory of the human species of the<br />

highest class is, in Pl<strong>at</strong>o's St<strong>at</strong>e, dependent upon the con-<br />

tented performance of their social functions by the lower<br />

classes. This contented performance of social function<br />

being the sole good of which the lower classes are con-<br />

* See Chmptcri XV, pp. 593-& ** XV* pp* 643-6$*.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!